Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18534327›Full record

Trial reportComplementary therapies in medicine2008

A detailed safety assessment of a saw palmetto extract.

Andrew L Avins, Stephen Bent, Suzanne Staccone, Evelyn Badua, Amy Padula, Harley Goldberg, John Neuhaus, Esther Hudes, Katusto Shinohara, Christopher Kane

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Complementary therapies in medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Efficacy and Safety ofNutrients · 2026
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Complementary and alternative medicine use by otolaryngology patients: a paradigm for practitioners in all surgical specialties.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2010
    Article
  12. Acute liver damage due to Serenoa repens: a case report.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2010
    Article
  13. Review
  14. IsAmerican journal of men's health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrew L AvinsDivision of Research, Northern California Kaiser Permanente, San Francisco, CA, USA. andrew.avins@ucsf.edu <andrew.avins@ucsf.edu>
Stephen Bent
Suzanne Staccone
Evelyn Badua
Amy Padula
Harley Goldberg
John Neuhaus
Esther Hudes
Katusto Shinohara
Christopher Kane

Funding

SAW PALMETTO EXTRACT IN BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIAR01DK056199 · NIDDK · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI AVINS, ANDREW L · 1999 to 2003
$1.6M
Early Identification of Adverse Reactions to HerbsK08AT001338 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BENT, STEPHEN W · 2003 to 2007
$608k
NCCIH NIH HHS K08 AT001338NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK056199NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK56199
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSaw palmetto is commonly used by men for lower-urinary tract symptoms. Despite its widespread use, very little is known about the potential toxicity of this dietary supplement.

methodsThe Saw palmetto for Treatment of Enlarged Prostates (STEP) study was a randomized clinical trial performed among 225 men with moderate-to-severe symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia, comparing a standardized extract of the saw palmetto berry (160 mg twice daily) with a placebo over a 1-year period. As part of this study, detailed data were collected on serious and non-serious adverse events, sexual functioning, and laboratory tests of blood and urine. Between-group differences were assessed with mixed-effects regression models.

resultsThere were no significant differences observed between the saw palmetto and placebo-allocated participants in the risk of suffering at least one serious adverse event (5.4% vs. 9.7%, respectively; p=0.31) or non-serious symptomatic adverse event (34.8% vs. 30.1%, p=0.48). There were few significant between-group differences in sexual functioning or for most laboratory analyses, with only small differences observed in changes over time in total bilirubin (p=0.001), potassium (p=0.03), and the incidence of glycosuria (0% in the saw palmetto group vs. 3.7% in the placebo group, p=0.05).

conclusionsDespite careful assessment, no evidence for serious toxicity of saw palmetto was observed in this clinical trial. Given the sample size and length of this study, however, these data do not rule out potential rare adverse effects associated with the use of saw palmetto.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPhytotherapySerenoaAgedDouble-Blind MethodHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlant ExtractsProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic HyperplasiaRegression AnalysisSexualityPlant ExtractsProstate-Specific Antigensaw palmetto extract

Identifiers

PMID18534327
PMCPMC2518869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.