Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18533821›Full record

ArticleNeural computation2008

Just-in-time connectivity for large spiking networks.

William W Lytton, Ahmet Omurtag, Samuel A Neymotin, Michael L Hines

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Neural computation, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Towards real-time communication betweenJournal of computational surgery · 2014
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The virtual slice setup.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

William W LyttonDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Biomedical Engineering, and Neurology, SUNY Downstate, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA. billl@neurosim.downstate.edu
Ahmet Omurtag
Samuel A Neymotin
Michael L Hines

Funding

COMPUTER METHODS FOR PHYSIOLOGICAL PROBLEMSR01NS011613 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL L HINES, Robert A. McDougal · 1985 to 2026
$10.4M
Reverse Engineering Cortical CircuitryR01NS045612 · NINDS · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI LYTTON, WILLIAM W · 2004 to 2007
$926k
NINDS NIH HHS NS11613NINDS NIH HHS NS45612NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS011613NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS045612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The scale of large neuronal network simulations is memory limited due to the need to store connectivity information: connectivity storage grows as the square of neuron number up to anatomically relevant limits. Using the NEURON simulator as a discrete-event simulator (no integration), we explored the consequences of avoiding the space costs of connectivity through regenerating connectivity parameters when needed: just in time after a presynaptic cell fires. We explored various strategies for automated generation of one or more of the basic static connectivity parameters: delays, postsynaptic cell identities, and weights, as well as run-time connectivity state: the event queue. Comparison of the JitCon implementation to NEURON's standard NetCon connectivity method showed substantial space savings, with associated run-time penalty. Although JitCon saved space by eliminating connectivity parameters, larger simulations were still memory limited due to growth of the synaptic event queue. We therefore designed a JitEvent algorithm that added items to the queue only when required: instead of alerting multiple postsynaptic cells, a spiking presynaptic cell posted a callback event at the shortest synaptic delay time. At the time of the callback, this same presynaptic cell directly notified the first postsynaptic cell and generated another self-callback for the next delay time. The JitEvent implementation yielded substantial additional time and space savings. We conclude that just-in-time strategies are necessary for very large network simulations but that a variety of alternative strategies should be considered whose optimality will depend on the characteristics of the simulation to be run.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerAction PotentialsAlgorithmsAnimalsComputer SimulationElectronic Data ProcessingHumansNerve NetNeuronsSynapsesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID18533821
PMCPMC2562879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.