Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18533045›Full record

SynthesisHealth and quality of life outcomes2008

A systematic review of mobility instruments and their measurement properties for older acute medical patients.

Natalie A de Morton, David J Berlowitz, Jennifer L Keating

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04075461 (Is arthroplaSty bEtter Than interNal Fixation in the undiSplaced Femoral nEck Fracture? A National Pragmatical Randomized Controlled Trial - the SENSE Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04075461 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Is arthroplaSty bEtter Than interNal Fixation in the undiSplaced Femoral nEck Fracture? A National Pragmatical Randomized Controlled Trial - the SENSE Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Southern DenmarkRan2020 to 2025Enrolled330ConditionsUndisplaced Fracture, Femoral Neck Fractures, Internal Fixation, ComplicationsArmsArthroplasty, Internal fixation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Interventions for improving mobility after hip fracture surgery in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Is arthroplaBMJ open · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Natalie A de MortonDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Australia. natalie.demorton@med.monash.edu.au
David J Berlowitz
Jennifer L Keating

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndependent mobility is a key factor in determining readiness for discharge for older patients following acute hospitalisation and has also been identified as a predictor of many important outcomes for this patient group. This review aimed to identify a physical performance instrument that is not disease specific that has the properties required to accurately measure and monitor the mobility of older medical patients in the acute hospital setting.

methodsDatabases initially searched were Medline, Cinahl, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials without language restriction or limits on year of publication until July 2005. After analysis of this yield, a second step was the systematic search of Medline, Cinahl and Embase until August 2005 for evidence of the clinical utility of each potentially suitable instrument. Reports were included in this review if instruments described had face validity for measuring from bed bound to independent levels of ambulation, the items were suitable for application in an acute hospital setting and the instrument required observation (rather than self-report) of physical performance. Evidence of the clinical utility of each potentially suitable instrument was considered if data on measurement properties were reported.

resultsThree instruments, the Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS), Hierarchical Assessment of Balance and Mobility (HABAM) and the Physical Performance Mobility Examination (PPME) were identified as potentially relevant. Clinimetric evaluation indicated that the HABAM has the most desirable properties of these three instruments. However, the HABAM has the limitation of a ceiling effect in an older acute medical patient population and reliability and minimally clinically important difference (MCID) estimates have not been reported for the Rasch refined HABAM. These limitations support the proposal that a new mobility instrument is required for older acute medical patients.

conclusionNo existing instrument has the properties required to accurately measure and monitor mobility of older acute medical patients.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingGeriatric AssessmentLocomotionAgedHealth Services for the AgedHumansReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID18533045
PMCPMC2430553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.