Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18533041›Full record

ArticleProteome science2008

Protein profiling of the dimorphic, pathogenic fungus, Penicillium marneffei.

Julie M Chandler, Erin R Treece, Heather R Trenary, Jessica L Brenneman, Tressa J Flickner, Jonathan L Frommelt, Zaw M Oo, Megan M Patterson, William T Rundle, Olga V Valle and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteome science, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Transcription Activator Swi6 Interacts with Mbp1 inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Adaptation to macrophage killing byFuture science OA · 2017
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Proteomic Insights on the Metabolism ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julie M ChandlerProteomics Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, OH 44555-3601, USA.
Erin R TreeceDepartment of Chemistry, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, OH 44555-3663, USA.
Heather R TrenaryDepartment of Chemistry, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, OH 44555-3663, USA.
Jessica L Brenneman *Proteomics Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, OH 44555-3601, USA.
Tressa J Flickner *Proteomics Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, OH 44555-3601, USA.
Jonathan L Frommelt *Proteomics Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, OH 44555-3601, USA.
Zaw M Oo *Proteomics Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, OH 44555-3601, USA.
Megan M Patterson *Proteomics Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, OH 44555-3601, USA.
William T Rundle *Proteomics Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, OH 44555-3601, USA.
Olga V Valle *Proteomics Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, OH 44555-3601, USA.
Thomas D KimDepartment of Chemistry, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, OH 44555-3663, USA.
Gary R WalkerProteomics Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, OH 44555-3601, USA.
Chester R CooperProteomics Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, OH 44555-3601, USA.
Youngstown State University · USRochester Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPenicillium marneffei is a pathogenic fungus that afflicts immunocompromised individuals having lived or traveled in Southeast Asia. This species is unique in that it is the only dimorphic member of the genus. Dimorphism results from a process, termed phase transition, which is regulated by temperature of incubation. At room temperature, the fungus grows filamentously (mould phase), but at body temperature (37 degrees C), a uninucleate yeast form develops that reproduces by fission. Formation of the yeast phase appears to be a requisite for pathogenicity. To date, no genes have been identified in P. marneffei that strictly induce mould-to-yeast phase conversion. In an effort to help identify potential gene products associated with morphogenesis, protein profiles were generated from the yeast and mould phases of P. marneffei.

resultsWhole cell proteins from the early stages of mould and yeast development in P. marneffei were resolved by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Selected proteins were recovered and sequenced by capillary-liquid chromatography-nanospray tandem mass spectrometry. Putative identifications were derived by searching available databases for homologous fungal sequences. Proteins found common to both mould and yeast phases included the signal transduction proteins cyclophilin and a RACK1-like ortholog, as well as those related to general metabolism, energy production, and protection from oxygen radicals. Many of the mould-specific proteins identified possessed similar functions. By comparison, proteins exhibiting increased expression during development of the parasitic yeast phase comprised those involved in heat-shock responses, general metabolism, and cell-wall biosynthesis, as well as a small GTPase that regulates nuclear membrane transport and mitotic processes in fungi. The cognate gene encoding the latter protein, designated RanA, was subsequently cloned and characterized. The P. marneffei RanA protein sequence, which contained the signature motif of Ran-GTPases, exhibited 90% homology to homologous Aspergillus proteins.

conclusionThis study clearly demonstrates the utility of proteomic approaches to studying dimorphism in P. marneffei. Moreover, this strategy complements and extends current genetic methodologies directed towards understanding the molecular mechanisms of phase transition. Finally, the documented increased levels of RanA expression suggest that cellular development in this fungus involves additional signaling mechanisms than have been previously described in P. marneffei.

Identifiers

PMID18533041
PMCPMC2478645
OpenAlexW1992097460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.