ArticleBMC genomics2008
Exon and junction microarrays detect widespread mouse strain- and sex-bias expression differences.
Article in BMC genomics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Full-Length Transcriptome Comparison of Male and Female Gonads inBiomolecules · 2026Article
- Sex-Specific Selection Drives the Evolution of Alternative Splicing in Birds.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Article
- The genetics of pubertal timing in the general population: recent advances and evidence for sex-specificity.Current opinion in endocrinology, diabetes, and obesity · 2016Review
- Genomic architecture of asthma differs by sex.Genomics · 2015Article
- Pathways analysis of differential gene expression induced by engrafting doses of total body irradiation for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in mice.Immunogenetics · 2013Article
- Identification and characterization of alternative exon usage linked glioblastoma multiforme survival.BMC medical genomics · 2012Article
- Dynamic, sex-differential STAT5 and BCL6 binding to sex-biased, growth hormone-regulated genes in adult mouse liver.Molecular and cellular biology · 2012Article
- Distinct regulatory programs establish widespread sex-specific alternative splicing in Drosophila melanogaster.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2011Article
- Computational detection of alternative exon usage.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2011Article
- Evolution of alternative splicing in primate brain transcriptomes.Human molecular genetics · 2010Article
- Sex-specific and lineage-specific alternative splicing in primates.Genome research · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStudies have shown that genetic and sex differences strongly influence gene expression in mice. Given the diversity and complexity of transcripts produced by alternative splicing, we sought to use microarrays to establish the extent of variation found in mouse strains and genders. Here, we surveyed the effect of strain and sex on liver gene and exon expression using male and female mice from three different inbred strains.
results71 liver RNA samples from three mouse strains - DBA/2J, C57BL/6J and C3H/HeJ - were profiled using a custom-designed microarray monitoring exon and exon-junction expression of 1,020 genes representing 9,406 exons. Gene expression was calculated via two different methods, using the 3'-most exon probe ("3' gene expression profiling") and using all probes associated with the gene ("whole-transcript gene expression profiling"), while exon expression was determined using exon probes and flanking junction probes that spanned across the neighboring exons ("exon expression profiling"). Widespread strain and sex influences were detected using a two-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) regardless of the profiling method used. However, over 90% of the genes identified in 3' gene expression profiling or whole transcript profiling were identified in exon profiling, along with 75% and 38% more genes, respectively, showing evidence of differential isoform expression. Overall, 55% and 32% of genes, respectively, exhibited strain- and sex-bias differential gene or exon expression.
conclusionExon expression profiling identifies significantly more variation than both 3' gene expression profiling and whole-transcript gene expression profiling. A large percentage of genes that are not differentially expressed at the gene level demonstrate exon expression variation suggesting an influence of strain and sex on alternative splicing and a need to profile expression changes at sub-gene resolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.