Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18524946›Full record

ReviewEndocrine-related cancer2008

Endocrine disruptors and prostate cancer risk.

Gail S Prins

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endocrine-related cancer, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 203 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals and Disease Endpoints.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gail S PrinsDepartment of Urology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA. gprins@uic.edu
University of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Epigenetic Basis for Prostate Carcinogenesis following Early Estrogenic ExposuresR01ES015584 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI HO, SHUK-MEI, PRINS, GAIL S · 2008 to 2012
$3.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES015584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is increasing evidence both from epidemiology studies and animal models that specific endocrine-disrupting compounds may influence the development or progression of prostate cancer. In large part, these effects appear to be linked to interference with estrogen signaling, either through interacting with ERs or by influencing steroid metabolism and altering estrogen levels within the body. In humans, epidemiologic evidence links specific pesticides, PCBs and inorganic arsenic exposures to elevated prostate cancer risk. Studies in animal models also show augmentation of prostate carcinogenesis with several other environmental estrogenic compounds including cadmium, UV filters and BPA. Importantly, there appears to be heightened sensitivity of the prostate to these endocrine disruptors during the critical developmental windows including in utero and neonatal time points as well as during puberty. Thus infants and children may be considered a highly susceptible population for ED exposures and increased risk of prostate cancers with aging.

Indexed as

AgricultureAndrogen AntagonistsEndocrine DisruptorsEnvironmental ExposureHumansMalePesticidesProstatic NeoplasmsRisk FactorsAndrogen AntagonistsEndocrine DisruptorsPesticides

Identifiers

PMID18524946
PMCPMC2822396
OpenAlexW2161544170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.