Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18523721›Full record

ReviewJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2008

Neuroproteomics as a promising tool in Parkinson's disease research.

Ilse S Pienaar, William M U Daniels, Jürgen Götz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Parkinson's disease mouse models in translational research.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2011
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ilse S PienaarDepartment of Medical Physiology, University of Stellenbosch, Matieland, South Africa. ilse.pienaar@dpag.ox.ac.uk
William M U Daniels
Jürgen Götz

Funding

Developmental Stress and Vulnerability to Brain InjuryR21DA018087 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ZIGMOND, MICHAEL J · 2003 to 2004
$242k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA018087NIDA NIH HHS R21DA018087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the vast number of studies on Parkinson's disease (PD), its effective diagnosis and treatment remains unsatisfactory. Hence, the relentless search for an optimal cure continues. The emergence of neuroproteomics, with its sophisticated techniques and non-biased ability to quantify proteins, provides a methodology with which to study the changes in neurons that are associated with neurodegeneration. Neuroproteomics is an emerging tool to establish disease-associated protein profiles, while also generating a greater understanding as to how these proteins interact and undergo post-translational modifications. Furthermore, due to the advances made in bioinformatics, insight is created concerning their functional characteristics. In this review, we first summarize the most prominent proteomics techniques and then discuss the major advances in the fast-growing field of neuroproteomics in PD. Ultimately, it is hoped that the application of this technology will lead towards a presymptomatic diagnosis of PD, and the identification of risk factors and new therapeutic targets at which pharmacological intervention can be aimed.

Indexed as

Parkinson DiseaseAnimalsBiomedical ResearchHumansNeurologyProteomics

Identifiers

PMID18523721
PMCPMC2862282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.