ArticleThe Journal of membrane biology2008
Atomic force microscopy imaging of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1 toxins interacting with insect midgut apical membranes.
Article in The Journal of membrane biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcriptomic analysis ofBiology open · 2019Article
- Single molecule fluorescence study of the Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cry1Aa reveals tetramerization.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2011Article
- Rapid topology probing using fluorescence spectroscopy in planar lipid bilayer: the pore-forming mechanism of the toxin Cry1Aa of Bacillus thuringiensis.The Journal of general physiology · 2010Article
- Residue 544 in domain III of the Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac toxin is involved in protein structure stability.The protein journal · 2010Article
- In situ molecular level studies on membrane related peptides and proteins in real time using sum frequency generation vibrational spectroscopy.Journal of structural biology · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atomic force microscopy was used to image Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins interacting with their natural targets, Manduca sexta midgut brush border membranes (BBMs), as well as with dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine-dioleoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC-DOPC) solid-supported lipid bilayers. In lipid bilayers, Cry1Aa formed structures 30-60 nm wide and 3-7 nm high, mostly at the interface of domains formed by the two different lipids or at the edge of DOPC-enriched domains. BBM vesicles, in the absence of toxin, formed flat membrane fragments of up to 25 microm(2) and 4.2 nm high, with irregular embedded structures. After incubation with Cry1Aa, Cry1Ac and Cry1C, which are active against M. sexta, new structures, 35 nm wide and 5.1-6.7 nm high, were observed in some membrane fragments, sometimes only in particular regions. Their density, which reached a plateau within 4 h, was toxin- and concentration-dependent. The structures formed by Cry1Ac were often grouped into dense, two-dimensional arrangements. No such specific interactions were observed with Cry1Ba, which is inactive against M. sexta. This study provides the first visual demonstration of specific interactions of Bt toxins with insect midgut BBMs at the nanometric scale. The observed structures likely represent the protein complexes forming functional Bt pores in target membranes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.