Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18523559›Full record

ArticlePloS one2008

The pathway to detangle a scrambled gene.

Matthias Möllenbeck, Yi Zhou, Andre R O Cavalcanti, Franziska Jönsson, Brian P Higgins, Wei-Jen Chang, Stefan Juranek, Thomas G Doak, Grzegorz Rozenberg, Hans J Lipps and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. RNA-Mediated Epigenetic Programming of Genome Rearrangements.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2011
    Review
  18. RNA-dependent control of gene amplification.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
  19. Alternative processing of scrambled genes generates protein diversity in the ciliate Chilodonella uncinata.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2010
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Matthias MöllenbeckInstitute of Cell Biology, University Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
Yi Zhou
Andre R O Cavalcanti
Franziska Jönsson
Brian P Higgins
Wei-Jen Chang
Stefan Juranek
Thomas G Doak
Grzegorz Rozenberg
Hans J Lipps
Laura F Landweber
Princeton University · USWitten/Herdecke University · DELeiden University · NL

Funding

UNDERSTANDING COMPLEX GENE EDITING SYSTEMS IN PROTISTSR01GM059708 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI LANDWEBER, LAURA F · 1999 to 2016
$4.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM59708NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProgrammed DNA elimination and reorganization frequently occur during cellular differentiation. Development of the somatic macronucleus in some ciliates presents an extreme case, involving excision of internal eliminated sequences (IESs) that interrupt coding DNA segments (macronuclear destined sequences, MDSs), as well as removal of transposon-like elements and extensive genome fragmentation, leading to 98% genome reduction in Stylonychia lemnae. Approximately 20-30% of the genes are estimated to be scrambled in the germline micronucleus, with coding segment order permuted and present in either orientation on micronuclear chromosomes. Massive genome rearrangements are therefore critical for development. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsTo understand the process of DNA deletion and reorganization during macronuclear development, we examined the population of DNA molecules during assembly of different scrambled genes in two related organisms in a developmental time-course by PCR. The data suggest that removal of conventional IESs usually occurs first, accompanied by a surprising level of error at this step. The complex events of inversion and translocation seem to occur after repair and excision of all conventional IESs and via multiple pathways. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study reveals a temporal order of DNA rearrangements during the processing of a scrambled gene, with simpler events usually preceding more complex ones. The surprising observation of a hidden layer of errors, absent from the mature macronucleus but present during development, also underscores the need for repair or screening of incorrectly-assembled DNA molecules.

Indexed as

Gene RearrangementAnimalsCell NucleusCiliophoraCloning, MolecularDNA, ProtozoanPolymerase Chain ReactionRecombination, GeneticSequence DeletionDNA, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID18523559
PMCPMC2394655
OpenAlexW1981326970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.