Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18522922›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2008

Phylogenomics reveals a new 'megagroup' including most photosynthetic eukaryotes.

Fabien Burki, Kamran Shalchian-Tabrizi, Jan Pawlowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Single cell ecology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  8. Origins of peptidases.Biochimie · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. BIR Pipeline for Preparation of Phylogenomic Data.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2015
    Review

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fabien BurkiDepartment of Zoology and Animal Biology, University of Geneva, Geneva 4, Switzerland. fabien.burki@zoo.unige.ch
Kamran Shalchian-Tabrizi
Jan Pawlowski

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in molecular phylogeny of eukaryotes have suggested a tree composed of a small number of supergroups. Phylogenomics recently established the relationships between some of these large assemblages, yet the deepest nodes are still unresolved. Here, we investigate early evolution among the major eukaryotic supergroups using the broadest multigene dataset to date (65 species, 135 genes). Our analyses provide strong support for the clustering of plants, chromalveolates, rhizarians, haptophytes and cryptomonads, thus linking nearly all photosynthetic lineages and raising the question of a possible unique origin of plastids. At its deepest level, the tree of eukaryotes now receives strong support for two monophyletic megagroups comprising most of the eukaryotic diversity.

Indexed as

GenomicsPhotosynthesisPhylogenyBayes TheoremBiological EvolutionEukaryotic Cells

Identifiers

PMID18522922
PMCPMC2610160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.