Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18522670›Full record

Trial reportHealth services research2008

Targeting primary care referrals to smoking cessation clinics does not improve quit rates: implementing evidence-based interventions into practice.

Elizabeth M Yano, Lisa V Rubenstein, Melissa M Farmer, Bruce A Chernof, Brian S Mittman, Andrew B Lanto, Barbara F Simon, Martin L Lee, Scott E Sherman

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health services research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00012987 nacompletednot on this map

Implementing Guidelines for Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Trial of Evidence-Based Quality Improvement

TypeinterventionalSponsorUS Department of Veterans AffairsEnrolled2,500ConditionsSmoking, Smoking Cessation, Quality ImprovementArmsQuality Improvement
NCT03194958 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Helping the Poor Quit Smoking: Specialized Quitlines and Meeting Basic Needs

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2017 to 2022Enrolled1,944ConditionsSmoking Cessation, Smoking, Tobacco, Smoking, Cigarette, Smoking, PipeArmsSpecialized Quitline, Basic Needs Navigator
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Strategies to improve smoking cessation rates in primary care.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. System change interventions for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth M YanoVA Greater Los Angeles HSR&D Center of Excellence, Sepulveda VA Ambulatory Care Center (152), 16111 Plummer Street, Sepulveda, CA 91343, USA.
Lisa V Rubenstein
Melissa M Farmer
Bruce A Chernof
Brian S Mittman
Andrew B Lanto
Barbara F Simon
Martin L Lee
Scott E Sherman
VA Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Center · USScan Foundation · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the impact of a locally adapted evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI) approach to implementation of smoking cessation guidelines into routine practice. DATA SOURCES/STUDY

settingWe used patient questionnaires, practice surveys, and administrative data in Veterans Health Administration (VA) primary care practices across five southwestern states. STUDY

designIn a group-randomized trial of 18 VA facilities, matched on size and academic affiliation, we evaluated intervention practices' abilities to implement evidence-based smoking cessation care following structured evidence review, local priority setting, quality improvement plan development, practice facilitation, expert feedback, and monitoring. Control practices received mailed guidelines and VA audit-feedback reports as usual care. DATA COLLECTION: To represent the population of primary care-based smokers, we randomly sampled and screened 36,445 patients to identify and enroll eligible smokers at baseline (n=1,941) and follow-up at 12 months (n=1,080). We used computer-assisted telephone interviewing to collect smoking behavior, nicotine dependence, readiness to change, health status, and patient sociodemographics. We used practice surveys to measure structure and process changes, and administrative data to assess population utilization patterns. PRINCIPAL

findingsIntervention practices adopted multifaceted EBQI plans, but had difficulty implementing them, ultimately focusing on smoking cessation clinic referral strategies. While attendance rates increased (p<.0001), we found no intervention effect on smoking cessation.

conclusionsEBQI stimulated practices to increase smoking cessation clinic referrals and try other less evidence-based interventions that did not translate into improved quit rates at a population level.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicCross-Sectional StudiesEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareQuality ImprovementReferral and ConsultationSmoking CessationSocioeconomic FactorsUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs

Identifiers

PMID18522670
PMCPMC2653889
OpenAlexW2107560847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.