Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18521649›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2009

A demonstration project of a multi-component educational intervention to improve integrated post-fracture osteoporosis care in five rural communities in Ontario, Canada.

S B Jaglal, G Hawker, V Bansod, N M Salbach, M Zwarenstein, J Carroll, D Brooks, C Cameron, E Bogoch, L Jaakkimainen and 1 more

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Identifying characteristics of an effective fracture liaison service: systematic literature review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Coordinator-based systems for secondary prevention in fragility fracture patients.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2011
    Pooled it
  6. Closing the gap in postfracture care at the population level: a randomized controlled trial.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2012
    Trial
  7. Impact of a centralized osteoporosis coordinator on post-fracture osteoporosis management: a cluster randomized trial.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2012
    Trial
  8. The impact of two educational interventions on osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment after fragility fracture: a population-based randomized controlled trial.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2011
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Osteoporosis knowledge translation for young adults: new directions for prevention programs.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2017
    Article
  12. Patient perceptions of provider barriers to post-fracture secondary prevention.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2014
    Article
  13. Secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures--an "OPTIMAL" model of care from Singapore.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Bone quality: educational tools for patients, physicians, and educators.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2011
    Article
  16. Accident or osteoporosis?: Survey of community follow-up after low-trauma fracture.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2011
    Article
  17. The Ontario Osteoporosis Strategy: implementation of a population-based osteoporosis action plan in Canada.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2010
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

S B JaglalOsteoporosis Research Program, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. susan.jaglal@utoronto.ca
G Hawker
V Bansod
N M Salbach
M Zwarenstein
J Carroll
D Brooks
C Cameron
E Bogoch
L Jaakkimainen
H Kreder
University of Toronto · CAWomen's College Hospital · CAHealth Sciences Centre · CAInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CAMount Sinai Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThis study evaluated a multi-component intervention (educational materials and outreach visits) to increase knowledge and improve post-fracture care management in five rural communities in Canada. One hundred and twenty-five patients pre- intervention and 149 post-intervention were compared. No significant improvement in post-fracture care was documented suggesting that a more targeted intervention is needed.

introductionCurrently, the majority of patients with a low trauma fracture are under-investigated and under-treated for osteoporosis. We set out to evaluate an educational intervention on increasing knowledge of post-fracture care among health care professionals (HCPs) and fracture patients and on improving post-fracture management.

methodsWe studied five rural communities in Ontario, Canada, using a multi-component intervention ("Behind the Break"), including educational material for HCPs and patients and educational outreach visits to physicians. The study had a historical control, non-equivalent pre/post design. Telephone surveys were carried out with individuals > or =40 years of age who had a low trauma fracture in 2003 (n = 125) or in 2005 (n = 149). Family physicians and emergency department staff were also surveyed.

resultsA total of 4,207 educational packages were distributed. Seventy-three percent of family physicians had an outreach visit. Two-thirds indicated that they received enough information about post-fracture follow-up to incorporate it into their practice. Despite this, no significant improvement in post-fracture care was documented (32% in the "pre" group had a bone mineral density test and 25% in the "post" group). Of those diagnosed with osteoporosis, the majority were prescribed a bone-sparing medication (63% "pre" and 80% "post").

conclusionA more targeted intervention linking fracture patients to their physician needs to be evaluated in rural communities.

Indexed as

Patient Education as TopicAgedChi-Square DistributionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFractures, BoneHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalRural PopulationTeaching Materials

Identifiers

PMID18521649
OpenAlexW2061247415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.