ArticleSarcoma2004
A Phase II Study of Docetaxel for the Treatment of Recurrent Osteosarcoma.
Article in Sarcoma, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- RPN2 Gene Confers Osteosarcoma Cell Malignant Phenotypes and Determines Clinical Prognosis.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2014Article
- Comparison of pirarubicin-based versus gemcitabine-docetaxel chemotherapy for relapsed and refractory osteosarcoma: a single institution experience.International journal of clinical oncology · 2013Article
- Comprehensive analysis of published phase I/II clinical trials between 1990-2010 in osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma confirms limited outcomes and need for translational investment.Clinical sarcoma research · 2012Article
- Management of osteosarcoma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2006Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine the response and toxicity of docetaxel in recurrent osteosarcoma and related spindle cell tumours of bone. PATIENTS AND
methodsFourteen patients, 10 males and four females, were enrolled, median age 30.5 years (range, 17-46). Diagnosis was: conventional osteosarcoma, 12 patients; periosteal osteosarcoma, one patient; and malignant fibrous histiocytoma of bone, one patient. Initial chemotherapy had been with doxorubicin and cisplatin in 10 patients, and multiagent regimens in four. Nine had been treated with second line chemotherapy before receiving docetaxel. Thirteen patients had lung metastases and one intra-abdominal disease. Docetaxel 100 mg/malpha(2) was given as a 1-h infusion every 3 weeks. Response was assessed every two cycles to a maximum of six.
resultsA total of 43 cycles were given, median of two per patient (range 1-6). Thirteen patients were evaluable for response. A single partial remission was seen, for a response rate of 8%. Two patients had stable disease, and one patient a mixed response. Forty cycles were evaluable for toxicity. The principle toxicity was haematological, with a median neutrophil count of 0.9 (range 0-9.6). There were four episodes of neutropenic sepsis (10%). The only non-haematological toxicity >/=grade 3 was stomatitis, occurring in just one patient. There were no toxic deaths.
conclusionDocetaxel at this dose and schedule is well tolerated, but is not associated with significant activity in patients with relapsed osteosarcoma.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.