ArticleSarcoma1997
Disseminating adamantinoma of the tibia.
Article in Sarcoma, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recurrent adamantinoma metastatic to the spine: Clinical and imaging considerations.Radiology case reports · 2021Article
- Adamantinomatous tumors: Long-term follow-up study of 20 patients treated at a single institution.Journal of surgical oncology · 2020Article
- Long-Term Follow-Up of Adamantinoma of the Tibia Complicated by Metastases and a Second Unrelated Primary Cancer: A Case Report and Literature Review.Case reports in orthopedics · 2018Article
- First Confirmed Metastatic Adamantinoma of the Spine: Case Report and Literature Review.Global spine journal · 2015Article
- Diagnostic pitfalls in tibial adamantinoma: two cases with a clinicopathological review.Clinics and practice · 2011Article
- Interventional management of extensive pulmonary metastasis in adamantinoma.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient. This report describes a patient with a primary long bone adamantinoma. The lesion was initially wrongly diagnosed as fibrous dysplasia and the patient was treated by curettage. At second local recurrence, the tumour had progressed from an osteofibrous dysplasia-like to a full-blown classic adamantinoma, with metastatic potential to the lungs 19 years after the initial treatment. Lung metastasectomy by sternotomy was carried out twice in a period of over 3.5 years. The patient is currently alive without evidence of other metastatic disease.Discussion. From the files of the Netherlands Committee on Bone Tumors, another five patients with lung metastaseswere studied. All types of adamantinoma should be treated by complete en bloc resection. For patients with metastatic spread to the lungs, close radiological follow-up and excision of tumour nodules seems to be the only logic treatment modality.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.