ArticleSarcoma1997
Prognostic markers in chondrosarcoma: evaluation of cell proliferation and of regulators of the cell cycle.
Article in Sarcoma, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomarkers of chondrosarcoma.Journal of clinical pathology · 2018Review
- The importance of Src signaling in sarcoma.Oncology letters · 2015Article
- Characterization of a new human cell line (CH-3573) derived from a grade II chondrosarcoma with matrix production.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2012Article
- Conventional grade 1 chondrosarcoma: a challenging diagnosis with important implications on therapy and prognosis.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose. The prognosis, treatment principles and prediction of clinical outcome of patients with chondrosarcoma currently rest on histologic grading which is somewhat ambiguous due to difficulty in pathologic interpretation of this neoplasm. Immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry and oncogene/tumor suppressor gene expression have been examined as alternative indices to predict the biologic behavior of these tumors. Because of partial successes obtained with flow cytometry and because of the improvement in predicting recurrence offered by examining the S-phase fraction, we undertook the current study to determine if expression of specific regulators of the cell cycle would act as prognostic indicators for these patients.Subjects/methods. We examined archival pathologic specimens from 39 patients with at least 2 years' clinical follow-up for the presence of p53, Rb, src and MIB-1 by immunohistochemistry and correlated this with clinical histories and incidence of recurrence.Results. While Rb, p53 and src gene products were identified to a variable extent in these specimens, there was no prognostic significance to their expression. In contrast, MIB-1, an epitope expressed only during semiconservative replication and an accepted marker of cell proliferation, served as a significant prognostic indicator. MIB-1 staining was present in 14.5% of tumor cells in all specimens (range 0-59%). When MIB-1 staining was examined with respect to disease recurrence, there was a statistically significant association between staining and histologic grade (p < 0.05) as well as event-free survival (p < 0.02). Comparing survival curves stratified by MIB-1 expression, there was a significant decrease in event-free survival associated with increasing MIB-1 indices (p < 0.003). Covariates that were associated with event-free survival include histologic grade (p = 0.025) and stage (Musculoskeletal Tumor Society) (p = 0.014). There was no statistical association with patient age (p = 0.15), tumor size (p = 0.47), tumor histology (p = 0.62) or anatomic location (p = 0.316).Discussion. These results indicate that determination of the proliferation index by MIB-1 immunostaining may serve as a useful adjunct to current histopathologic classification. Patients with a high proliferation index may benefit from established adjuvant therapies or experimental approaches including immunotherapy or biologic modulation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.