ReviewCurrent opinion in urology2008
New insights into the pharmacology of the bladder.
Review in Current opinion in urology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Brief Overview of Cholinergic and Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitors in Diabetic Bladder Dysfunction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Understanding overactive bladder and urgency incontinence: what does the brain have to do with it?F1000Research · 2018Review
- Three Gaseous Neurotransmitters, Nitric oxide, Carbon Monoxide, and Hydrogen Sulfide, Are Involved in the Neurogenic Relaxation Responses of the Porcine Internal Anal Sphincter.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2016Article
- The role of phosphodiesterases in bladder pathophysiology.Nature reviews. Urology · 2013Review
- [Effects of botulinum toxin type A in the single and repeated treatment of overactive bladder. A prospective analysis].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2010Article
- Development, plasticity and modulation of visceral afferents.Brain research reviews · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewPharmacotherapy of a number of bladder disorders has traditionally focused on targeting the 'sensory' component or bladder nerves and the smooth muscle. This review aims to provide an insight into recent (experimental and clinical) developments in mechanisms of existing therapies as well as novel targets. RECENT
findingsTraditionally, sensory signaling in the urinary bladder has been attributed to activation of bladder afferents, but new findings have pointed to the urothelium and interstitial cells as key participants in the transduction of sensory events. Recent advances provide strong support for the development of subtype selective receptor agonists/antagonists, the modulation of signal transduction cascades and new and expanded uses for various neurotoxins. SUMMARY: The development of therapeutic options for the treatment of a number of bladder disorders is complicated, and most treatments are associated with an increased incidence of side effects or lack of specificity. Recent studies suggest that selective targeting of receptors/ion channels or a disease-specific (i.e. phosphorylated) form of the receptor may represent a viable therapeutic target. Though the mechanisms regulating ion channel expression under pathological conditions are not fully known, an increased understanding of these pathways has important implications for drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.