ArticleExperimental brain research2008
Different forms of MARCKS protein are involved in memory formation in the learning process of imprinting.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Filial Imprinting: Behaviour and Neurobiology.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Src-NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 complex and recognition memory of imprinting in domestic chicks.PloS one · 2024Article
- Src and Memory: A Study of Filial Imprinting and Predispositions in the Domestic Chick.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Visual Imprinting in Birds: Behavior, Models, and Neural Mechanisms.Frontiers in physiology · 2019Review
- Micro-RNAs, their target proteins, predispositions and the memory of filial imprinting.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Effects of NMDAR Antagonist on the Regulation of P-MARCKS Protein to AβNeurochemical research · 2018Article
- In search of a recognition memory engram.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2015Review
- Molecular mechanisms of memory in imprinting.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2015Review
- A Proteomic Study of Memory After Imprinting in the Domestic Chick.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2015Article
- X MARCKS the spot: myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate in neuronal function and disease.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2015Review
- Searching for novel Cdk5 substrates in brain by comparative phosphoproteomics of wild type and Cdk5-/- mice.PloS one · 2014Article
- Altered magnetic resonance images of brain and social behaviors of hatchling, and expression of thyroid hormone receptor βmRNA in cerebellum of embryos after Methimazole administration.Psychopharmacology · 2014Article
- Impaired social behavior in chicks exposed to sodium valproate during the last week of embryogenesis.Psychopharmacology · 2013Article
- AMPA receptor phosphorylation and recognition memory: learning-related, time-dependent changes in the chick brain following filial imprinting.Experimental brain research · 2013Article
- Functional role of the interaction between polysialic acid and myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate at the plasma membrane.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2013Article
- Genotype-phenotype correlation in interstitial 6q deletions: a report of 12 new cases.Neurogenetics · 2012Article
- Translating the frontiers of brain repair to treatments: starting not to break the rules.Neurobiology of disease · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is strong evidence that a restricted part of the chick forebrain, the IMM (formerly IMHV), stores information acquired through the learning process of visual imprinting. Twenty-four hours after imprinting training, a learning-specific increase in amount of myristoylated, alanine-rich C-kinase substrate (MARCKS) protein is known to occur in the homogenate fraction of IMM. We investigated the two components of this fraction, membrane-bound and cytoplasmic-phosphorylated MARCKS. In IMM, amount of membrane-bound MARCKS, but not of cytoplasmic-phosphorylated MARCKS, increased as chicks learned. No changes were observed for either form of MARCKS in PPN, a control forebrain region. The results indicate that there is a learning-specific increase in membrane-bound, non-phosphorylated MARCKS 24 h after training. This increase might contribute to stabilization of synaptic morphology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18516597What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.