ReviewEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2008
Systematic of psychiatric disorders between categorical and dimensional approaches: Kraepelin's dichotomy and beyond.
Review in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Subthreshold attention deficit hyperactivity in children and adolescents: a systematic review.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2014Pooled it
- Revealing differential psychotic symptoms in schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder by manifold learning and network analyses.Translational psychiatry · 2025Article
- Distinguished Frontal White Matter Abnormalities Between Psychotic and Nonpsychotic Bipolar Disorders in a Pilot Study.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Cognitive Function in Patients with Psychotic and Affective Disorders: Effects of Combining Pharmacotherapy with Cognitive Remediation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Operational definitions and measurement of externalizing behavior problems: An integrative review including research models and clinical diagnostic systems.World journal of psychiatry · 2023Review
- Diagnostic Agreement between Physicians and a Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry Team at a General Hospital: An Exploratory Study across 20 Years of Referrals.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Impaired Subcortical Detection of Auditory Changes in Schizophrenia but Not in Major Depression.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2020Article
- Staging of Schizophrenia With the Use of PANSS: An International Multi-Center Study.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2019Article
- Is schizophrenia still one entity with similar symptomatic patterns, neurobiological characteristics, and treatment perspectives?European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2018Article
- Comorbidity of Physical and Anxiety Symptoms in Adolescent: Functional Impairment, Self-Rated Health and Subjective Well-Being.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Article
- Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and nonsuicidal self-injury in a clinical sample of adolescents: the role of comorbidities and gender.BMC psychiatry · 2018Article
- Suicidal Risk, Psychopathology, and Quality of Life in a Clinical Population of Adolescents.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2018Article
- Validity of remission and recovery criteria for schizophrenia and major depression: comparison of the results of two one-year follow-up naturalistic studies.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2017Article
- The Kraepelinian tradition.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2015Article
- DSM-5 reviewed from different angles: goal attainment, rationality, use of evidence, consequences—part 2: bipolar disorders, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorders, trauma- and stressor-related disorders, personality disorders, substance-related and addictive disorders, neurocognitive disorders.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2015Review
- DSM-5 reviewed from different angles: goal attainment, rationality, use of evidence, consequences--part 1: general aspects and paradigmatic discussion of depressive disorders.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2015Article
- DSM-IV "criterion A" schizophrenia symptoms across ethnically different populations: evidence for differing psychotic symptom content or structural organization?Culture, medicine and psychiatry · 2014Article
- [Syndromal versus nosological diagnosis].Der Nervenarzt · 2013Review
- Neurocognitive Functioning in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder: Clarifying Concepts of Diagnostic Dichotomy vs. Continuum.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2013Article
- Mania: diagnosis and treatment recommendations.Current psychiatry reports · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper describes basic principles of systematics for psychiatric disorders such as the categorical and dimensional approach. It summarises validity aspects of the traditional psychiatric nosology and syndromatology. The importance and limitations of the dichotomy of schizophrenia and affective disorders, first suggested by Kraepelin, is reviewed in the light of results from modern research in the field of classification, follow-up and neurobiological studies, especially neurochemical, neurogenetic and neuroimaging studies. Current developments towards DSM-V and ICD-11 are critically reflected. The conclusion is reached that there might be insufficient data to establish a new systematics of psychoses. Therefore it might be premature to leave the Kraepelinian dichotomy totally although it has to be modified in the light of new research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18516518What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.