Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18516517›Full record

ReviewEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2008

The DSM-V initiative "deconstructing psychosis" in the context of Kraepelin's concept on nosology.

Wolfgang Gaebel, Jürgen Zielasek

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Focus on psychosis.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2015
    Review
  3. The Kraepelinian tradition.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Psychiatry as a medical specialty: challenges and opportunities.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2010
    Article
  9. Neurophysiological mechanisms of psychotic symptoms.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2008
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wolfgang GaebelKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Rheinische Kliniken Düsseldorf, Bergische Landstr. 2, 40629, Düsseldorf, Germany. wolfgang.gaebel@uni-duesseldorf.de
Jürgen Zielasek

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The revision process of the international psychiatric classification systems has started and is expected to result in new versions of the International Classification of Disorders (then ICD-11) and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (then DSM-V) in approximately 2014 and 2012, respectively. In the process of developing DSM-V, several research conferences jointly sponsored by the American Psychiatric Association, the National Institutes of Health, and the World Health Organization, are currently taking place. We will here focus on the impact that the DSM-V initiative "Deconstructing Psychosis" will have on the future of diagnosing a psychotic state, and how this may be viewed from a European context of Kraepelin's nosology of psychiatric disorders.

Indexed as

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansInternational Classification of DiseasesManuals as TopicMental DisordersPsychiatryPsychotic Disorders

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.