Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18513360›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2008

Characterizing the ERP Old-New effect in a short-term memory task.

Jared F Danker, Grace M Hwang, Lynne Gauthier, Aaron Geller, Michael J Kahana, Robert Sekuler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Visual memory.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Dynamics of brain activity reveal a unitary recognition signal.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Neural bases of automaticity.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jared F DankerVolen Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454, USA.
Grace M Hwang
Lynne Gauthier
Aaron Geller
Michael J Kahana
Robert Sekuler

Funding

Intracranial Recordings Reveal Task Dependent ThetaR01MH061975 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KAHANA, MICHAEL JACOB · 2002 to 2018
$5.2M
Visual Recognition Memory: Integrating Perception and CognitionR01MH068404 · NIMH · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI SEKULER, ROBERT · 2004 to 2010
$2.1M
NIMH NIH HHS MH068404NIMH NIH HHS MH61975NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH061975NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH068404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The early and late components of the event-related potential (ERP) Old-New effect are well characterized with respect to long-term memory, and have been associated with processes of familiarity and recollection, respectively. Now, using a short-term memory paradigm with verbal and nonverbal stimuli, we explored the way that these two components respond to variation in recency and stimulus type. We found that the amplitude of the early component (or frontal N400, FN400) showed Old-New effects only for verbal stimuli and increased with recency. In contrast, the later component (or late positive component, LPC) showed Old-New effects across a range of stimulus types and did not scale with recency. These results are consistent with the way that these same ERP components have been characterized in long-term memory, supporting the idea that some of the same processes underlie long- and short-term item recognition.

Indexed as

AdultCuesElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleFixation, OcularHumansMaleMemoryMemory, Short-TermPhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceReading

Identifiers

PMID18513360
PMCPMC2828935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.