Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18512090›Full record

ArticleEmergency radiology2008

Acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: is a radiological interventional approach an alternative to emergency surgery?

I Langner, S Langner, L I Partecke, A Glitsch, M Kraft, W v Bernstorff, N Hosten

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency radiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Radiographic techniques for the localization and treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding of obscure origin.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2011
    Article
  7. [Surgical intervention in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

I LangnerDepartment of Surgery, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
S Langner
L I Partecke
A Glitsch
M Kraft
W v Bernstorff
N Hosten
Universität Greifswald · DEUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of our study was to discuss the option of endovascular treatment compared to surgery for patients with endoscopically unmanageable nonvariceal hemorrhage of the upper gastrointestinal tract. From 2000 to 2006, 23 patients (male, 15 male; female, 8; mean age, 69 years) who failed endoscopic therapy for upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage were retrospectively evaluated. Twelve patients were operated on (SG), whereas 11 patients had an endovascular intervention (IG). Technical and primary clinical success rates and complications rates were calculated. Clinical parameters and comorbidities were related to outcome. The surgical group suffered less frequently from pre-existing pulmonary diseases (SG, 17%; IG, 55%; p = 0.05) and had a higher incidence of shock requiring catecholamines (p < 0.01) or plasma expander therapy (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the incidence of recurrent bleeding episodes (SG, 17%; IG, 27%; p = 0.35) and mortality rates (SG, 17%; IG, 27%, p = 0.35). Deaths in the IG were due to recurrent bleeding. In patients with unsuccessful endoscopic control of nonvariceal bleeding of the upper GI tract, surgery remains a very effective treatment. However, in patients with a high surgical risk due to unknown bleeding sources and/or severe pre-existing diseases/comorbidities, endovascular therapy offers an excellent treatment option. These patients should then be operated on as early as possible to minimize the risk of recurrent bleeding episodes, which are associated with high morbidity and mortality.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalUpper Gastrointestinal TractAgedEndoscopy, GastrointestinalFemaleGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansMaleRadiographyRetrospective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID18512090
OpenAlexW1980197995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.