Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18512028›Full record

ArticleArchivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis

A direct comparison of rejection by CD8 and CD4 T cells in a transgenic model of allotransplantation.

Paige M Porrett, Major K Lee, Moh Moh Lian, Jing Wang, Andrew J Caton, Shaoping Deng, James F Markmann, Daniel J Moore

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Best practices in mouse models of skin transplantation.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. CD4 T-Cell Exhaustion: Does It Exist and What Are Its Roles in Cancer?Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Paige M PorrettHarrison Department of Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Major K Lee
Moh Moh Lian
Jing Wang
Andrew J Caton
Shaoping Deng
James F Markmann
Daniel J Moore
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USMonroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital · USThe Wistar Institute · US

Funding

Regulatory T cells in transplantation toleranceR01AI048820 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MARKMANN, JAMES FRANCIS · 2001 to 2008
$2.6M
Intracellular Targeting of Proinflammatory Pathways to Ameliorate Type 1 DiabetesF32DK083161 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MOORE, DANIEL J. · 2008 to 2010
$152k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI048820NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI48820NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK083161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe relative contributions of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells to transplant rejection remain unknown. The authors integrated a previous model of CD4-mediated graft rejection with a complementary model of CD8-mediated rejection to directly compare the function of graft-reactive CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes in vivo in a model where rejection requires transgenic T cells. These studies allow direct comparison of CD4 and CD8 T cell responses to the same antigen without the confounding effects of T cell depletion or homeostatic proliferation. MATERIALS AND

methodsClone 4 and TS1 mice possess MHC class I- and II-restricted CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, respectively, which express transgenic T cell receptors that recognize the influenza hemagglutinin antigen (HA). We compared the in vivo response of CFSE-labeled, HA-specific transgenic CD8+ and CD4+ T cells after adoptive transfer into syngeneic BALB/c mice grafted with HA-expressing skin.

resultsAs in the authors' CD4+ model, HA104 skin was consistently rejected by both Clone 4 mice (n=9, MST: 14.2) and by 5 x 10(5) Clone 4 lymphocytes transferred to naive BALB/c hosts that do not otherwise reject HA+ grafts. Rejection correlated with extensive proliferation of either graft-reactive T cell subset in the draining lymph nodes, and antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ cells acquired effector function and proliferated with similar kinetics.

conclusionsThese data extend the authors' unique transgenic transplantation model to the investigation of CD8 T cell function. The initial results confirm fundamental functional similarity between the CD4 and CD8 T cell subsets and provide insight into the considerable redundancy underlying T cell mechanisms mediating allograft rejection.

Indexed as

AnimalsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalHemagglutininsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, TransgenicReceptors, Antigen, T-CellSkin TransplantationTransplantation, HomologousHemagglutininsReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell

Identifiers

PMID18512028
PMCPMC2766493
OpenAlexW2003993049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.