Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18511918›Full record

ReviewNature methods2008

A practical guide to single-molecule FRET.

Rahul Roy, Sungchul Hohng, Taekjip Ha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature methods, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 998 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
998citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

998 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Multivalent weak contacts shape chaperone-nascent protein interactions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Uninterrupted optical resolution of identical point scatterers undergoing nanometric changes in distance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. AI-Physics-Experiment Trinity for Integrated Protein Dynamics Modeling.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

938 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rahul RoyDepartment of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1110 West Green Street, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA.
Sungchul Hohng
Taekjip Ha

Funding

Single Molecule Study of Helicase MechanismsR01GM065367 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI HA, TAEKJIP · 2002 to 2014
$3.6M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM065367
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (smFRET) is one of the most general and adaptable single-molecule techniques. Despite the explosive growth in the application of smFRET to answer biological questions in the last decade, the technique has been practiced mostly by biophysicists. We provide a practical guide to using smFRET, focusing on the study of immobilized molecules that allow measurements of single-molecule reaction trajectories from 1 ms to many minutes. We discuss issues a biologist must consider to conduct successful smFRET experiments, including experimental design, sample preparation, single-molecule detection and data analysis. We also describe how a smFRET-capable instrument can be built at a reasonable cost with off-the-shelf components and operated reliably using well-established protocols and freely available software.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBiophysicsBiotechnologyBiotinBiotinylationCalibrationFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferFluorescent DyesMicrochemistryOxygenQuantum TheorySoftwareSpectrophotometryBiotinFluorescent DyesOxygen

Identifiers

PMID18511918
PMCPMC3769523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.