ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2008
Patients' attitudes to the summary care record and HealthSpace: qualitative study.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A Process Related View on the Usage of Electronic Health Records from the Patients' Perspective: A Systematic Review.Journal of medical systems · 2022Pooled it
- Interventions to increase patient portal use in vulnerable populations: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019Pooled it
- The Impact of Patient Online Access to Computerized Medical Records and Services on Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Pooled it
- The role and benefits of accessing primary care patient records during unscheduled care: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2017Pooled it
- Understanding factors affecting patient and public engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions: a systematic review of qualitative studies.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2016Pooled it
- Comparison of user groups' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review.BMC medicine · 2011Pooled it
- Patient engagement in the inpatient setting: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAPooled it
- Studying the Digital Intervention Engagement-Mediated Relationship Between Intrapersonal Measures and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Adherence in Sexual and Gender Minority Youth: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Trial
- Trial
- The Impact of Superfast Broadband, Tailored Booklets for Households, and Discussions With General Practitioners on Personal Electronic Health Readiness: Cluster Factorial Quasi-Randomized Control Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Trial
- Survey of patient and public perceptions of electronic health records for healthcare, policy and research: study protocol.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2012Trial
- Understanding Patient-Reported Offenses in Electronic Health Records: Cross-Sectional Mixed Methods Survey.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- What services, interventions and support are available for People with HIV in England to manage their overall health and wellbeing? A scoping review.HIV medicine · 2025Article
- A holistic view of facilitators and barriers of electronic health records usage from different perspectives: A qualitative content analysis approach.Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia · 2024Article
- Digital intervention for public health: searching for implementing characteristics, concepts and recommendations: scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Patients' Perspectives About Factors Affecting Their Use of Electronic Personal Health Records in England: Qualitative Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Patient Portal Implementation and Uptake: Qualitative Comparative Case Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Article
- Is research on patient portals attuned to health equity? A scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019Article
- Perceptions of the uses of routine general practice data beyond individual care in England: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo document the views of patients and the public towards the summary care record (SCR, a centrally stored medical record drawn from the general practice record) and HealthSpace (a personal health organiser accessible through the internet from which people can view their SCR), with a particular focus on those with low health literacy, potentially stigmatising conditions, or difficulties accessing health care.
design103 semistructured individual interviews and seven focus groups.
settingThree early adopter primary care trusts in England where the SCR and HealthSpace are being piloted. All were in areas of relative socioeconomic deprivation.
participantsIndividual participants were recruited from general practice surgeries, walk-in centres, out of hours centres, and accident and emergency departments. Participants in focus groups were recruited through voluntary sector organisations; they comprised advocates of vulnerable groups and advocates of people who speak limited English; people with HIV; users of mental health services; young adults; elderly people; and participants of a drug rehabilitation programme.
methodsParticipants were asked if they had received information about the SCR and HealthSpace and about their views on shared electronic records in different circumstances.
resultsMost people were not aware of the SCR or HealthSpace and did not recall receiving information about it. They saw both benefits and drawbacks to having an SCR and described a process of weighing the former against the latter when making their personal choice. Key factors influencing this choice included the nature of any illness (especially whether it was likely to lead to emergency care needs); past and present experience of healthcare and government surveillance; the person's level of engagement and health literacy; and their trust and confidence in the primary healthcare team and the wider NHS. Overall, people with stigmatising illness were more positive about the SCR than people who claimed to speak for "vulnerable groups." Misconceptions about the SCR were common, especially confusion about what data it contained and who would have access to it. Most people were not interested in recording their medical data or accessing their SCR via HealthSpace, but some saw the potential for this new technology to support self management and lay care for those with chronic illness.
conclusionDespite an extensive information programme in early adopter sites, the public remains unclear about current policy on shared electronic records, though most people view these as a positive development. The "implied consent" model for creating and accessing a person's SCR should be revisited, perhaps in favour of "consent to view" at the point of access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.