Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18511653›Full record

ReviewMolecular pharmacology2008

Protein-protein interactions and dopamine D2 receptor signaling: a calcium connection.

Gregg D Stanwood

Abstract readCommentReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular pharmacology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gregg D StanwoodDepartment of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt Kennedy Center, 23rd Ave South, 476 RRB, Nashville TN 37232-6600, USA. gregg.stanwood@vanderbilt.edu
John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts · US

Funding

THREE-TIERED PREVENTION MODEL TO BETTER SERVE ALL STUDENP30HD015052 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DYKENS, ELISABETH MAY · 1985 to 2014
$18.6M
NICHD NIH HHS P30-HD15052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The third cytoplasmic loop is a crucial site of physical contact between some G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and their respective G proteins. However, interactions not only occur among these proteins but also involve a number of additional protein binding partners. Modulation of these protein-protein interactions may represent an important new avenue of pharmacotherapy through which signaling of GPCRs can be modulated. In the current issue of Molecular Pharmacology, Liu et al. (p. 371) report that dopamine D(2) receptors interact with the Ca(2+) binding protein S100B. Using the third intracellular loop of the dopamine D(2) receptor as bait in a bacterial two-hybrid system, S100B was determined to be a potential binding partner. They used pull-down assays both in vitro and in vivo to confirm the interaction and define its specificity. Neither the D(3) nor the D(4) receptor expresses the motif conferring the interaction, and peptides based on the third intracellular loop of the D(3) receptor did not pull down S100B. Some groups might stop there, but Liu and colleagues moved on to demonstrate colocalization of the D(2) receptor and S100B by immunostaining. Functional assays were then used to show that coexpression of S100B with the D(2) receptor increases the ability of D(2) receptors to activate ERK and to inhibit adenylyl cyclase. These data suggest that S100B coexpression may serve as an important mediator of D(2) receptor signaling efficacy in the brain. These interactions contribute to cellular, regional, and developmental differences in D(2) receptor activation.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalciumHumansProtein BindingProtein Interaction MappingReceptors, Dopamine D2Signal TransductionCalciumReceptors, Dopamine D2

Identifiers

PMID18511653
OpenAlexW2094118470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.