Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18511300›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2008

The Brain Connectivity Workshops: moving the frontiers of computational systems neuroscience.

Klaas Enno Stephan, Jorge J Riera, Gustavo Deco, Barry Horwitz

Abstract readConference Proceedings
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Analyzing effective connectivity with functional magnetic resonance imaging.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science · 2010
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Klaas Enno StephanWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N3BG, UK. k.stephan@fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk
Jorge J Riera
Gustavo Deco
Barry Horwitz

Funding

Neuromodeling, Functional Brain Imaging And LanguageZ01DC000057 · NIDCD · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS · PI HORWITZ, BARRY · 1999 to 2008
$2.3M
Intramural NIH HHS NIH0010163596Intramural NIH HHS Z01 DC000057Wellcome Trust 056750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the link between neurobiology and cognition requires that neuroscience moves beyond mere structure-function correlations. An explicit systems perspective is needed in which putative mechanisms of how brain function is constrained by brain structure are mathematically formalized and made accessible for experimental investigation. Such a systems approach critically rests on a better understanding of brain connectivity in its various forms. Since 2002, frontier topics of connectivity and neural system analysis have been discussed in a multidisciplinary annual meeting, the Brain Connectivity Workshop (BCW), bringing together experimentalists and theorists from various fields. This article summarizes some of the main discussions at the two most recent workshops, 2006 at Sendai, Japan, and 2007 at Barcelona, Spain: (i) investigation of cortical micro- and macrocircuits, (ii) models of neural dynamics at multiple scales, (iii) analysis of "resting state" networks, and (iv) linking anatomical to functional connectivity. Finally, we outline some central challenges and research trajectories in computational systems neuroscience for the next years.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsBrainComputational BiologyComputer SimulationHumansNerve NetNeural PathwaysNeurosciences

Identifiers

PMID18511300
PMCPMC2574909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.