Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18509649›Full record

ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2008

A branching process for the early spread of a transposable element in a diploid population.

John M Marshall

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

John M MarshallDepartment of Biomathematics, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1766, USA. johnmm@ucla.edu
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Niono Irrigation Project and Malaria: A Computer ModelR01AI051633 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI TAYLOR, CHARLES E · 2002 to 2006
$1.8M
Dynamics of Transposable Elements in Mosquito VectorsR56AI072549 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI TAYLOR, CHARLES E · 2007 to 2007
$150k
NIAID NIH HHS 1R56AI072549NIAID NIH HHS R01AI51633
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transposable elements (TEs) face significant challenges upon transfer into a new host population, invariably beginning their invasion with only a single element. The fate of this element is a product of its internal properties, the population dynamics of the host species, and genetic drift. We present a continuous-time multi-type branching process to model the early stages of TE spread. The model incorporates seasonal population size changes and is applicable to diploid hosts for prevalences up to 10%. We reproduce standard results of TE population dynamics and show that population growth may have a greater influence on reducing TE loss probability than a transpositional burst. These results are applied to the planned use of a TE to drive an antimalarial gene into an Anopheles gambiae population. The model favors a transgenic release immediately following the dry season when the An. gambiae population begins to grow. Increasing the number of transgenic hosts released has the greatest influence on reducing the probability of TE loss. Following release, the rate at which the TE increases its proportion in the population is most sensitive to its replicative transposition rate. The model recommends a replicative transposition rate greater than 0.1 per TE per generation to satisfy public health goals.

Indexed as

DNA Transposable ElementsModels, GeneticAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedAnophelesDiploidyFemaleHumansInsect VectorsMalariaMaleMathematicsPopulation DensityReproductionDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID18509649
OpenAlexW2053905537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.