Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18509380›Full record

ArticleGene therapy2008

Cell entry targeting restricts biodistribution of replication-competent retroviruses to tumour tissue.

L J Duerner, A Schwantes, I C Schneider, K Cichutek, C J Buchholz

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gene therapy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Optimal delivery of RNA interference by viral vectors for cancer therapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2023
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Lentiviral vectors in gene therapy: their current status and future potential.Archivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

L J DuernerAbteilung Medizinische Biotechnologie, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany.
A Schwantes
I C Schneider
K Cichutek
C J Buchholz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virotherapy is currently being developed for many different types of viruses including replication-competent murine leukaemia virus (MLV) as a novel tool in cancer therapy. However, there is the risk of insertional mutagenesis associated with this virus, making careful preclinical studies necessary before its first application in man. We have previously generated conditionally replication-competent MLV variants that require activation by tumour-associated proteases to become infectious. Here we analysed in a comparative study the spreading of non-targeted and of such tumour-targeted MLV variants to tumour and extratumoural organs in immunodeficient mice. Both virus types were able to efficiently infect tumour cells after systemic administration. The non-targeted virus, however, also infected extratumoural organs like bone marrow, spleen and liver efficiently. In contrast, the targeted viruses revealed in a quantitative analysis of virus spreading an up to 500-fold more selective infection of tumour tissue than the non-targeted virus. The data raise serious doubts about a safe clinical use of non-targeted MLV. Engineering the virus to become activatable by tumour-associated proteases can significantly improve the safety of MLV.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone MarrowCell LineCell Line, TumorFemaleGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsHumansInjections, IntravenousLiverMatrix MetalloproteinasesMiceMice, SCIDNeoplasmsOncolytic VirotherapyRetroviridaeMatrix Metalloproteinases

Identifiers

PMID18509380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.