Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18509080›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2008

Arousal facilitates collision avoidance mediated by a looming sensitive visual neuron in a flying locust.

F Claire Rind, Roger D Santer, Geraldine A Wright

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Neonicotinoid and sulfoximine pesticides differentially impair insect escape behavior and motion detection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  4. Neuromodulation of insect motion vision.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Satiation level affects anti-predatory decisions in foraging juvenile crayfish.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Widespread sensitivity to looming stimuli and small moving objects in the central complex of an insect brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F Claire RindSchool of Biology, Ridley Building, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK. claire.rind@ncl.ac.uk
Roger D Santer
Geraldine A Wright
Newcastle University · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Locusts have two large collision-detecting neurons, the descending contralateral movement detectors (DCMDs) that signal object approach and trigger evasive glides during flight. We sought to investigate whether vision for action, when the locust is in an aroused state rather than a passive viewer, significantly alters visual processing in this collision-detecting pathway. To do this we used two different approaches to determine how the arousal state of a locust affects the prolonged periods of high-frequency spikes typical of the DCMD response to approaching objects that trigger evasive glides. First, we manipulated arousal state in the locust by applying a brief mechanical stimulation to the hind leg; this type of change of state occurs when gregarious locusts accumulate in high-density swarms. Second, we examined DCMD responses during flight because flight produces a heightened physiological state of arousal in locusts. When arousal was induced by either method we found that the DCMD response recovered from a previously habituated state; that it followed object motion throughout approach; and--most important--that it was significantly more likely to generate the maintained spike frequencies capable of evoking gliding dives even with extremely short intervals (1.8 s) between approaches. Overall, tethered flying locusts responded to 41% of simulated approaching objects (sets of 6 with 1.8 s ISI). When we injected epinastine, the neuronal octopamine receptor antagonist, into the hemolymph responsiveness declined to 12%, suggesting that octopamine plays a significant role in maintaining responsiveness of the DCMD and the locust to visual stimuli during flight.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDibenzazepinesFemaleFlight, AnimalHabituation, PsychophysiologicHistamine H1 AntagonistsImidazolesLocusta migratoriaMaleMotion PerceptionNeuronsPhysical StimulationTime FactorsVisual PathwaysDibenzazepinesepinastineHistamine H1 AntagonistsImidazoles

Identifiers

PMID18509080
PMCPMC2525709
OpenAlexW1979741959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.