Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18508761›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2008

Multiple intrinsically disordered sequences alter DNA binding by the homeodomain of the Drosophila hox protein ultrabithorax.

Ying Liu, Kathleen S Matthews, Sarah E Bondos

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Biology of Hox Genes: Questions and Technological Challenges.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Hox genes in development and beyond.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. The unstructured linker of Mlh1 contains a motif required for endonuclease function which is mutated in cancers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Diversification and Functional Evolution of HOX Proteins.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  15. Transcription Factor Dynamics.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ying LiuDepartment of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
Kathleen S Matthews
Sarah E Bondos
Rice University · US

Funding

PHYSICAL AND GENETIC STUDIES OF REPRESSOR PROTEINSR01GM022441 · NIGMS · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI MATTHEWS, KATHLEEN S · 1985 to 2009
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 22441NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM022441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During animal development, distinct tissues, organs, and appendages are specified through differential gene transcription by Hox transcription factors. However, the conserved Hox homeodomains bind DNA with high affinity yet low specificity. We have therefore explored the structure of the Drosophila melanogaster Hox protein Ultrabithorax and the impact of its nonhomeodomain regions on DNA binding properties. Computational and experimental approaches identified several conserved, intrinsically disordered regions outside the homeodomain of Ultrabithorax that impact DNA binding by the homeodomain. Full-length Ultrabithorax bound to target DNA 2.5-fold weaker than its isolated homeodomain. Using N-terminal and C-terminal deletion mutants, we demonstrate that the YPWM region and the disordered microexons (termed the I1 region) inhibit DNA binding approximately 2-fold, whereas the disordered I2 region inhibits homeodomain-DNA interaction a further approximately 40-fold. Binding is restored almost to homeodomain affinity by the mostly disordered N-terminal 174 amino acids (R region) in a length-dependent manner. Both the I2 and R regions contain portions of the activation domain, functionally linking DNA binding and transcription regulation. Given that (i) the I1 region and a portion of the R region alter homeodomain-DNA binding as a function of pH and (ii) an internal deletion within I1 increases Ultrabithorax-DNA affinity, I1 must directly impact homeodomain-DNA interaction energetics. However, I2 appears to indirectly affect DNA binding in a manner countered by the N terminus. The amino acid sequences of I2 and much of the I1 and R regions vary significantly among Ultrabithorax orthologues, potentially diversifying Hox-DNA interactions.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsDNADrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGene DeletionHomeodomain ProteinsHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationModels, BiologicalMolecular Sequence DataMutationProtein Structure, TertiarySequence Homology, Amino AcidTranscriptional ActivationTranscription FactorsTranscription, GeneticDNADrosophila ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsTranscription FactorsUbx protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID18508761
PMCPMC2475714
OpenAlexW2020817293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.