Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18507396›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2008

Role of the N- and C-terminal domains in binding of apolipoprotein E isoforms to heparan sulfate and dermatan sulfate: a surface plasmon resonance study.

Yuko Yamauchi, Noriko Deguchi, Chika Takagi, Masafumi Tanaka, Padmaja Dhanasekaran, Minoru Nakano, Tetsurou Handa, Michael C Phillips, Sissel Lund-Katz, Hiroyuki Saito

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. APOB to estimated APOB ratio for screening for the APOE2 genotype.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Vascular Heparan Sulfate and Amyloid-β in Alzheimer's Disease Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. APOE Christchurch-mimetic therapeutic antibody reduces APOE-mediated toxicity and tau phosphorylation.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuko YamauchiGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.
Noriko Deguchi
Chika Takagi
Masafumi Tanaka
Padmaja Dhanasekaran
Minoru Nakano
Tetsurou Handa
Michael C Phillips
Sissel Lund-Katz
Hiroyuki Saito
Philadelphia University · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USKobe Pharmaceutical University · JPKyoto University · JPUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

STRUCTURAL BASIS OF THE INTERACTIONS OF APOLIPOPROTEIN ER01HL056083 · NHLBI · MCP HAHNEMANN UNIVERSITY · PI LUND-KATZ, SISSEL · 1997 to 2013
$5.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL56083NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL056083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of apolipoprotein E (apoE) to bind to cell-surface glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) is important for lipoprotein remnant catabolism. Using surface plasmon resonance, we previously showed that the binding of apoE to heparin is a two-step process; the initial binding involves fast electrostatic interaction, followed by a slower hydrophobic interaction. Here we examined the contributions of the N- and C-terminal domains to each step of the binding of apoE isoforms to heparan sulfate (HS) and dermatan sulfate (DS). ApoE3 bound to less sulfated HS and DS with a decreased favorable free energy of binding in the first step compared to heparin, indicating that the degree of sulfation has a major effect on the electrostatic interaction of GAGs with apoE. Mutation of a key Lys residue in the N-terminal heparin binding site of apoE significantly affected this electrostatic interaction. Progressive truncation of the C-terminal alpha-helical regions which favors the monomeric form of apoE3 greatly weakened the ability of apoE3 to bind to HS, with a much reduced favorable free energy of binding of the first step, suggesting that the C-terminal domain contributes to the GAG binding of apoE by the oligomerization effect. In agreement with this, dimerization of the apoE3 N-terminal fragment via disulfide linkage restored the electrostatic interaction of apoE with HS. Significantly, apoE4 exhibited much stronger binding to HS and DS than apoE2 or apoE3 in both lipid-free and lipidated states, perhaps resulting from enhanced electrostatic interaction through the N-terminal domain. This isoform difference in GAG binding of apoE may be physiologically significant such as in the retention of apoE-containing lipoproteins in the arterial wall.

Indexed as

AnimalsApolipoprotein E3Apolipoprotein E4Apolipoproteins EBinding SitesCircular DichroismDermatan SulfateDisulfidesHeparan SulfateHumansHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsLysineMutationProtein BindingProtein MultimerizationStatic ElectricityApolipoprotein E3Apolipoprotein E4Apolipoproteins EDermatan SulfateDisulfidesHeparan SulfateLysine

Identifiers

PMID18507396
PMCPMC2844924
OpenAlexW1987210223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.