ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2008
Presence of lobular carcinoma in situ does not increase local recurrence in patients treated with breast-conserving therapy.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2014Guideline
- Evaluation of exogenous estrogen use in patients with lobular neoplasia and its role in subsequent breast cancer development.Surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Does Non-Classic Lobular Carcinoma In Situ at the Lumpectomy Margin Increase Local Recurrence?Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Absence of lobular carcinoma in situ is a poor prognostic marker in invasive lobular carcinoma.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2023Article
- Presence of Non-classic LCIS Is Not a Contraindication to Breast Conservation in Patients with Concomitant Invasive Breast Cancer or DCIS.Annals of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- Prognostic Significance of Lobular Carcinoma In-Situ (LCIS) Diagnosed Alongside Invasive Breast Cancer.Breast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2022Article
- Lobular Breast Cancer: Histomorphology and Different Concepts of a Special Spectrum of Tumors.Cancers · 2021Review
- Risk of Contralateral Breast Cancer in Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Associated with Synchronous Ipsilateral Lobular Carcinoma In Situ.Annals of surgical oncology · 2019Article
- Treatment and survival outcomes of lobular carcinomaOncotarget · 2017Article
- Pleomorphic lobular carcinomaOncology letters · 2016Article
- Trends and controversies in multidisciplinary care of the patient with breast cancer.Current problems in surgery · 2016Review
- Features of Pure Lobular Carcinoma In Situ on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Associated with Immediate Re-Excision after Lumpectomy.Journal of breast cancer · 2016Article
- Current management of lesions associated with an increased risk of breast cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2015Review
- Evaluation of resection margins in breast conservation therapy: the pathology perspective-past, present, and future.International journal of surgical oncology · 2012Article
- Significance of lobular intraepithelial neoplasia at margins of breast conservation specimens: a report of 38 cases and literature review.Diagnostic pathology · 2010Review
- Margin assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive lobular cancer.American journal of surgery · 2009Article
- Thresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2009.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2009Article
- Practical consensus recommendations for tumor margins and breast conservative surgery.South Asian journal of cancerArticle
- Update 2010 of the German AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Early and Metastatic Breast Cancer - Chapter B: Prevention, Early Detection, Lifestyle, Premalignant Lesions, DCIS, Recurrent and Metastatic Breast Cancer.Breast care (Basel, Switzerland)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is known to be a risk factor for the development of invasive breast cancer. Debate continues as to whether LCIS is also a precursor lesion. We hypothesized that, if LCIS were a precursor, its presence in the lumpectomy specimen, particularly at the margin, could increase local recurrence (LR) after breast-conserving therapy (BCT).
methods2894 patients treated with BCT for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), stage I or II breast cancer between 1/80 and 5/07 were identified. Patients with DCIS or invasive cancer at the margins or those receiving neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. Group A had 290 patients with LCIS in the lumpectomy; 84 had LCIS at the final margin. Group B included 2604 patients with no evidence of LCIS.
resultsMedian patient age in group A and B was 57 and 58 years, respectively (P = 0.05); 12% and 13%, respectively, of patients in group A and B had margins <2 mm (P = NS). The histologic distribution of tumor types in group A was lobular in 47.2%, ductal in 34.5%, DCIS in 11.4%, and other invasive histologies in 6.9%, compared with 4.1%, 76.3%,13.6%, and 6.0% for group B, respectively (P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference between the groups in tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage. The crude rate of LR was 4.5% in group A and 3.8% in group B (P = NS). Five- and 10-year actuarial LR rates for LCIS at the margin were 6% and 6%, 1% and 15% for LCIS present but not at the margin, and 2% and 6% for no LCIS (P = NS), for group A and B, respectively. In multivariate analysis, menopausal status and adjuvant therapy use were significant predictors of LR. LCIS, either in the specimen or at the margin, was not significantly associated with LR.
conclusionPresence of LCIS, even at the margin, in BCT specimens does not have an impact on LR. Re-excision is not indicated if LCIS is present or close to margin surfaces. These findings do not support consideration of LCIS as a precursor to the development of invasive lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.