ArticlePediatric surgery international2008
Sign on the dotted line: parental consent.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Parental Perceptions About Informed Consent/Assent in Pediatric Research in Jordan.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2017Article
- Informed consent in primary dental care: patients' understanding and satisfaction with the consent process.British dental journal · 2015Article
- The experience of parents and children where children have been supported with a ventricular assist device as a bridge to heart transplantation.Pediatric cardiology · 2011Article
- Parental recall of anesthesia information: informing the practice of informed consent.Anesthesia and analgesia · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The issue of informed consent in paediatric surgery has always been contentious. Despite the fact that taking consent is one of the most frequently performed tasks of a surgeon, it is rarely audited. Indeed, there are few studies looking at the consent process in adult practice and fewer in the paediatric setting. The aim of this study was, therefore, to determine parental understanding, recall, attitudes and opinion of the consent process in a busy paediatric day surgery unit. A prospective study was conducted using a questionnaire consisting of 20 questions. These were handed out to the parents of all children undergoing one of four procedures: circumcision, prepuceplasty, orchidopexy and herniotomy over a 3-month-period. Completed questionnaires were collected and analysed. One hundred and sixty-one parents were asked to complete the questionnaire. Ninety-three were collected, a response rate of 58%, 87% believed consent was taken by the performing surgeon, 15% felt the consent process was rushed, but 91% thought the right amount of detail was given. Ninety-seven percent of parents believed that the consent form was a legal necessity and 72% believed that a child in Scotland had to be aged 16 or over to sign the consent form. Interestingly, 23% of parents were unsure if signing the consent form meant that they could not claim compensation if anything went wrong. Ninety-one percent recalled the procedure being explained in the outpatient clinic, but 22% did not remember potential complications being discussed. The amount parents recalled of potential complications varied. Seventy percent felt that a leaflet about the procedure prior to attending the unit would be helpful. In conclusion consent is an extremely important part of our practice. This study highlights some of the common parental misconceptions and limitations of the process. Parents appear satisfied and consenting for procedures is overall performed well. Some areas could be improved and more research is required in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18506452What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.