Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18506188›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2008

Prognostic molecular markers with no impact on decision-making: the paradox of gliomas based on a prospective study.

M Wager, P Menei, J Guilhot, P Levillain, S Michalak, B Bataille, J-L Blanc, F Lapierre, P Rigoard, S Milin and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Effect of CDKN2A/B rs4977756 polymorphism on glioma risk: a meta-analysis of 16 studies including 24077 participants.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Glioma pathophysiology: insights emerging from proteomics.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2010
    Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genetic advances in glioma: susceptibility genes and networks.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2010
    Review
  11. New insights into susceptibility to glioma.Archives of neurology · 2010
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

M WagerNeurosurgery Department, University Hospital, Poitiers, France. m.wager@chu-poitiers.fr
P Menei
J Guilhot
P Levillain
S Michalak
B Bataille
J-L Blanc
F Lapierre
P Rigoard
S Milin
F Duthe
D Bonneau
C-J Larsen
L Karayan-Tapon
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers · FRUniversité de Poitiers · FRUniversité d'Angers · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study assessed the prognostic value of several markers involved in gliomagenesis, and compared it with that of other clinical and imaging markers already used. Four-hundred and sixteen adult patients with newly diagnosed glioma were included over a 3-year period and tumour suppressor genes, oncogenes, MGMT and hTERT expressions, losses of heterozygosity, as well as relevant clinical and imaging information were recorded. This prospective study was based on all adult gliomas. Analyses were performed on patient groups selected according to World Health Organization histoprognostic criteria and on the entire cohort. The endpoint was overall survival, estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate analysis was followed by multivariate analysis according to a Cox model. p14(ARF), p16(INK4A) and PTEN expressions, and 10p 10q23, 10q26 and 13q LOH for the entire cohort, hTERT expression for high-grade tumours, EGFR for glioblastomas, 10q26 LOH for grade III tumours and anaplastic oligodendrogliomas were found to be correlated with overall survival on univariate analysis and age and grade on multivariate analysis only. This study confirms the prognostic value of several markers. However, the scattering of the values explained by tumour heterogeneity prevents their use in individual decision-making.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain NeoplasmsCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Decision MakingDNA MethylationDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesGliomaHumansLoss of HeterozygosityMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPrognosisPromoter Regions, GeneticCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16DNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesMGMT protein, humanTelomeraseTERT protein, humanTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18506188
PMCPMC2410116
OpenAlexW2063069674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.