Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18505964›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2008

Frequent p16-independent inactivation of p14ARF in human melanoma.

Daniel E Freedberg, Sushila H Rigas, Julie Russak, Weiming Gai, Margarita Kaplow, Iman Osman, Faye Turner, Juliette A Randerson-Moor, Alan Houghton, Klaus Busam and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Frontiers in oncology · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Alteration of Epigenetic Regulation by Long Noncoding RNAs in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  18. Coordinated transcription ofChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2018
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel E FreedbergDepartment of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, 550 First Ave, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Sushila H Rigas
Julie Russak
Weiming Gai
Margarita Kaplow
Iman Osman
Faye Turner
Juliette A Randerson-Moor
Alan Houghton
Klaus Busam
D Timothy Bishop
Boris C Bastian
Julia A Newton-Bishop
David Polsky
St James's University Hospital · GBUCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCancer Research UK · GBNew York University · US

Funding

TUMOR DEVELOPMENT AND PROGRESSION IN HUMAN MELANOCYTESP01CA025874 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI BASTIAN, BORIS C. · 1985 to 2015
$19.0M
Classification of ambiguous melanocytic tumorsR33CA095300 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI BASTIAN, BORIS C · 2002 to 2005
$1.2M
ALTERATIONS OF CELL CYCLE CONTROL IN MELANOCYTIC LESIONSK08AR002129 · NIAMS · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI POLSKY, DAVID · 1999 to 2003
$499k
Relevance of circulating mutant BRAF DNA in melanomaR21CA109388 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI POLSKY, DAVID · 2005 to 2006
$287k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA025874NCI NIH HHS P01 CA025874-25-A1NCI NIH HHS R21 CA109388NCI NIH HHS R33 CA095300NCI NIH HHS R33 CA95300NIAMS NIH HHS K08 AR02129
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe tumor suppressors p14(ARF) (ARF) and p16(INK4A) (p16) are encoded by overlapping reading frames at the CDKN2A/INK4A locus on chromosome 9p21. In human melanoma, the accumulated evidence has suggested that the predominant tumor suppressor at 9p21 is p16, not ARF. However, recent observations from melanoma-prone families and murine melanoma models suggest a p16-independent tumor suppressor role for ARF. We analyzed a group of melanoma metastases and cell lines to investigate directly whether somatic alterations to the ARF gene support its role as a p16-independent tumor suppressor in human melanoma, assuming that two alterations (genetic and/or epigenetic) would be required to inactivate a gene.

methodsWe examined the p16/ARF locus in 60 melanoma metastases from 58 patients and in 9 human melanoma cell lines using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect deletions, methylation-specific PCR to detect promoter methylation, direct sequencing to detect mutations affecting ARF and p16, and, in a subset of 20 tumors, immunohistochemistry to determine the effect of these alterations on p16 protein expression. All statistical tests were two-sided.

resultsWe observed two or more alterations to the ARF gene in 26/60 (43%) metastases. The p16 gene sustained two or more alterations in 13/60 (22%) metastases (P = .03). Inactivation of ARF in the presence of wild-type p16 was seen in 18/60 (30%) metastases.

conclusionGenetic and epigenetic analyses of the human 9p21 locus indicate that modifications of ARF occur independently of p16 inactivation in human melanoma and suggest that ARF is more frequently inactivated than p16.

Indexed as

Gene SilencingGenes, p16AnimalsCell Line, TumorChromosomes, Human, Pair 9Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16DNA MethylationGene DeletionHumansImmunoblottingImmunohistochemistryMelanomaMelanoma, ExperimentalMiceMicrosatellite RepeatsMutationCDKN2A protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Neoplasm ProteinsTumor Suppressor Protein p14ARF

Identifiers

PMID18505964
PMCPMC4410798
OpenAlexW2162806061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.