Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18505862›Full record

ArticleGenetics2008

Overdispersion of the molecular clock varies between yeast, Drosophila and mammals.

Trevor Bedford, Ilan Wapinski, Daniel L Hartl

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A variant-dependent molecular clock with anomalous diffusion models SARS-CoV-2 evolution in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  4. Epistatic contributions promote the unification of incompatible models of neutral molecular evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Why does a protein's evolutionary rate vary over time?Genome biology and evolution · 2013
    Article
  11. Universal pacemaker of genome evolution.PLoS computational biology · 2012
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Trevor BedfordDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA. tbedford@oeb.harvard.edu
Ilan Wapinski
Daniel L Hartl

Funding

The Evolution of Malerial Antifiolate ResistanceR01GM079536 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI HARTL, DANIEL L · 2007 to 2011
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM079536NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although protein evolution can be approximated as a "molecular evolutionary clock," it is well known that sequence change departs from a clock-like Poisson expectation. Through studying the deviations from a molecular clock, insight can be gained into the forces shaping evolution at the level of proteins. Generally, substitution patterns that show greater variance than the Poisson expectation are said to be "overdispersed." Overdispersion of sequence change may result from temporal variation in the rate at which amino acid substitutions occur on a phylogeny. By comparing the genomes of four species of yeast, five species of Drosophila, and five species of mammals, we show that the extent of overdispersion shows a strong negative correlation with the effective population size of these organisms. Yeast proteins show very little overdispersion, while mammalian proteins show substantial overdispersion. Additionally, X-linked genes, which have reduced effective population size, have gene products that show increased overdispersion in both Drosophila and mammals. Our research suggests that mutational robustness is more pervasive in organisms with large population sizes and that robustness acts to stabilize the molecular evolutionary clock of sequence change.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAmino Acid SubstitutionAnimalsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsFemaleFungal ProteinsHumansLikelihood FunctionsLinear ModelsMaleMammalsModels, GeneticPhylogenySaccharomycesSelection, GeneticDrosophila ProteinsFungal Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18505862
PMCPMC2429890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.