Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18505374›Full record

ReviewJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2008

Review of nonprimate, large animal models for osteoporosis research.

Susan Reinwald, David Burr

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. BoneJBMR plus · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Bone regeneration during osteoporosis: a translationalFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  14. Bats as instructive animal models for studying longevity and aging.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Dentoalveolar Defects of Hypophosphatasia are Recapitulated in a Sheep Knock-In Model.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Susan ReinwaldDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA. sureinwa@iupui.edu
David Burr

Funding

MUSCULOSKELETAL TRAINING GRANTT32AR007581 · NIAMS · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI BURR, DAVID B · 1996 to 2006
$1.4M
NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR007581NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR-7581
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large animal models are required for preclinical prevention and intervention studies related to osteoporosis research. The challenging aspect of this requirement is that no single animal model exactly mimics the progression of this human-specific chronic condition. There are pros and cons associated with the skeletal, hormonal, and metabolic conditions of each species that influence their relevance and applicability to human physiology. Of all larger mammalian species, nonhuman primates (NHPs) are preeminent in terms of replicating important aspects of human physiology. However, NHPs are very expensive, putting them out of reach of the vast majority of researchers. Practical, cost-effective alternatives to NHPs are sought after among ungulate (porcine, caprine, and ovine) and canine species that are the focus of this review. The overriding caveat to using large lower-order species is to take the time in advance to understand and appreciate the limitations and strengths of each animal model. Under these circumstances, experiments can be strategically designed to optimize the potential of an animal to develop the cardinal features of postmenopausal bone loss and/or yield information of relevance to treatment.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalPrimatesAnimalsEstrogensHumansOsteoporosisEstrogens

Identifiers

PMID18505374
PMCPMC2683153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.