ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2008
Bioenergy to save the world. Producing novel energy plants for growth on abandoned land.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Brownfield-related studies in the context of climate change: A comprehensive review and future prospects.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Protist diversity and community complexity in the rhizosphere of switchgrass are dynamic as plants develop.Microbiome · 2021Article
- Legume Intercropping With the Bioenergy CropFrontiers in plant science · 2018Article
- Coming Late for Dinner: Localized Digestate Depot Fertilization for Extensive Cultivation of Marginal Soil WithFrontiers in plant science · 2018Article
- Divergent Responses of Forest Soil Microbial Communities under Elevated COApplied and environmental microbiology · 2018Article
- Intra-specific variability in the response of maize to arsenic exposure.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2014Article
- Diversity of morphology and function in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses in Brachypodium distachyon.Planta · 2012Article
- A critical view of current state of phytotechnologies to remediate soils: still a promising tool?TheScientificWorldJournal · 2012Review
- Genome-wide analysis of plant metal transporters, with an emphasis on poplar.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2010Review
- Phytoremediation of contaminated soils and groundwater: lessons from the field.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2009Review
- Implications of metal accumulation mechanisms to phytoremediation.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimFollowing to the 2006 climate summit, the European Union formally set the goal of limiting global warming to 2 degrees Celsius. But even today, climate change is already affecting people and ecosystems. Examples are melting glaciers and polar ice, reports about thawing permafrost areas, dying coral reefs, rising sea levels, changing ecosystems and fatal heat periods. Within the last 150 years, CO2 levels rose from 280 ppm to currently over 400 ppm. If we continue on our present course, CO2 equivalent levels could approach 600 ppm by 2035. However, if CO2 levels are not stabilized at the 450-550 ppm level, the consequences could be quite severe. Hence, if we do not act now, the opportunity to stabilise at even 550 ppm is likely to slip away. Long-term stabilisation will require that CO2 emissions ultimately be reduced to more than 80% below current levels. This will require major changes in how we operate.
resultsReducing greenhouse gases from burning fossil fuels seems to be the most promising approach to counterbalance the dramatic climate changes we would face in the near future. It is clear since the Kyoto protocol that the availability of fossil carbon resources will not match our future requirements. Furthermore, the distribution of fossil carbon sources around the globe makes them an even less reliable source in the future. We propose to screen crop and non-crop species for high biomass production and good survival on marginal soils as well as to produce mutants from the same species by chemical mutagenesis or related methods. These plants, when grown in adequate crop rotation, will provide local farming communities with biomass for the fermentation in decentralized biogas reactors, and the resulting nitrogen rich manure can be distributed on the fields to improve the soil. DISCUSSION: Such an approach will open new economic perspectives to small farmers, and provide a clever way to self sufficient and sustainable rural development. Together with the present economic reality, where energy and raw material prices have drastically increased over the last decade, they necessitate the development and the establishment of alternative concepts.
conclusionsBiotechnology is available to apply fast breeding to promising energy plant species. It is important that our valuable arable land is preserved for agriculture. The opportunity to switch from low-income agriculture to biogas production may convince small farmers to adhere to their business and by that preserve the identity of rural communities. PERSPECTIVES: Overall, biogas is a promising alternative for the future, because its resource base is widely available, and single farms or small local cooperatives might start biogas plant operation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.