Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18504586›Full record

ArticlePlant cell reports2008

Assessment of genetic and epigenetic changes following cryopreservation in papaya.

A Kaity, S E Ashmore, R A Drew, M E Dulloo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant cell reports, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Best practices for cryopreserving, thawing, recovering, and assessing cells.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2017
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A KaitySchool of Biomolecular and Physical Sciences, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia. a.kaity@griffith.edu.au
S E Ashmore
R A Drew
M E Dulloo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A vitrification based cryopreservation technique for storage of in vitro shoot tips of papaya has been tested to ensure applicability across a range of genotypes and to assess the stability of both genotype and phenotype of such clonal material following cryopreservation. Shoot tips of 12 genotypes were cryopreserved, recovery rates were determined and resultant plants were screened for genetic and epigenetic changes. Genomic DNA structure was explored using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based randomly amplified DNA fingerprinting (RAF), and methylation patterns were monitored using the amplified DNA methylation polymorphism (AMP) PCR technique. Plantlets were recovered following cryopreservation in all but one genotype and recovery rates of 61-73% were obtained from six genotypes. The regenerated plantlets showed varying levels of genomic DNA modifications (0-10.07%), and methylation modifications (0.52-6.62%) of detected markers. These findings have not been reported previously for papaya, and indicate some genotype dependent variability in DNA modifications occur following cryopreservation which may result in somaclonal variation.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticCaricaCryopreservationDNA MethylationDNA, PlantGenetic MarkersGenotypePhenotypePlant ShootsRegenerationDNA, PlantGenetic Markers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.