ArticleMedscape journal of medicine2008
A computerized test battery sensitive to mild and severe brain injury.
Article in Medscape journal of medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- A full-spectrum aqueous extract of black cardamom (Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Trial
- Trial
- MLC901 (NeuroAiD II™) for cognition after traumatic brain injury: a pilot randomized clinical trial.European journal of neurology · 2018Trial
- Examining the durability of a hybrid, remote and computer-based cognitive remediation intervention for adolescents with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2018Trial
- Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of the effects of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and mixed amphetamine salts on cognition throughout the day in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.Clinical drug investigation · 2014Trial
- Carotid Artery Stenting Intervention to Enhance Global Brain Blood Flow and Cognition in Carotid Artery Disease: Preliminary Findings from a Prospective Follow-Up MRI Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Computerized Evaluation of Attention, Learning-Memory, and Executive Function in People with Disability Caused by Injury: A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical symptom clusters, neurocognitive function, balance and vestibulo-ocular function in athletes with sport-related concussion.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Computerised cognitive assessment in patients with traumatic brain injury: an observational study of feasibility and sensitivity relative to established clinical scales.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
- Cognitive performance in systemic lupus erythematosus patients: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study.BMC rheumatology · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Altered white matter microstructure in lupus patients: a diffusion tensor imaging study.Arthritis research & therapy · 2018Article
- A review of the validity of computerized neurocognitive assessment tools in mild traumatic brain injury assessment.Concussion (London, England) · 2017Review
- Senior Dance Experience, Cognitive Performance, and Brain Volume in Older Women.Neural plasticity · 2016Article
- Persistent problems 1 year after mild traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal population study in New Zealand.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016Article
- Cognitive remediation for adolescents with 22q11 deletion syndrome (22q11DS): a preliminary study examining effectiveness, feasibility, and fidelity of a hybrid strategy, remote and computer-based intervention.Schizophrenia research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveComputerized neurocognitive testing (CNT) appears to be suited to measure relatively mild degrees of neurocognitive impairment in circumstances where speed, efficiency, and low cost are important. Computerized tests are used in the evaluation and management of patients who have had mild brain injuries; the objective is to determine if computerized testing is equally reliable and valid in the evaluation of patients who have had more severe brain injuries.
designA cross-sectional, naturalistic study of brain injury patients compared with normal controls.
settingAn outpatient neuropsychiatry clinic.
participants141 patients, aged 18-65 years, who had sustained traumatic brain injuries (TBIs): 13 patients with postconcussion syndrome; 15 who had recovered from mild brain injuries; 85 patients who had had severe brain injuries, but who had recovered, and were living independently; and 28 severe brain injury patients who were unable to live without assistance; compared with 145 normal controls.
interventionsNot applicable.
main outcome measuresThe CNS Vital Signs (CNS VS) battery is a PC-based system that includes tests of verbal and visual memory, psychomotor speed, complex attention, reaction time, and cognitive flexibility.
resultsPerformance on the CNS VS battery was related to severity of brain injury and degree of recovery. Tests of psychomotor speed and cognitive flexibility were the most relevant to TBI status. Patients who had recovered from mild brain injuries scored almost as well as normal controls. The Neurocognition Index (NCI), a summary score based on performance on all the tests in the battery, was 100 for normal controls and 98 for recovered mild brain injury patients. Postconcussive patients scored 82 on the MCI, and severe brain injury patients scored 66 on the NCI if they were living independently and 47 if they were not.
conclusionsComputerized tests like CNS VS allow clinicians the advantage of precise neurocognitive measurement in the service of diagnosis and appropriate treatment. CNTs are never going to replace the flexibility or comprehensiveness of conventional neuropsychological testing, but they have a role to play in circumstances where a full test battery is not feasible, such as screening and serial assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18504479PMC2390690What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.