SynthesisMedscape journal of medicine2008
Therapeutic targets in rhinosinusitis: infection or inflammation?
Synthesis in Medscape journal of medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Acute effects of therapeutic 1-MHz ultrasound on nasal unblocking of subjects with chronic rhinosinusitis].Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngologyTrial
- The role of microbes in the pathogenesis of acute rhinosinusitis in young adults.The Laryngoscope · 2015Article
- Canadian guidelines for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis: clinical summary.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextRhinosinusitis (RS) is an inflammatory condition of the contiguous nasal and paranasal sinuses that is accompanied by a viral or bacterial infection. Controlling the inflammation will attenuate many of the symptoms of RS, including nasal blockage discharge, facial discomfort, headache, and hyposmia, and promote the clearance of the infectious agent.
objectiveThe objective is to review the efficacy of symptomatic treatment with intranasal corticosteroids (INS) for the inflammatory component of acute, recurrent, or chronic RS in adults and children. DATA SOURCES: Published English-language articles identified in the PubMed and MEDLINE databases. STUDY SELECTION: Only studies about clinical trials that were randomized, double-blind, and controlled for either placebo or active comparator were selected as valid evidence of the efficacy and tolerability of symptomatic treatment. Studies of INS use as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy with an antibiotic were consulted. DATA EXTRACTION: Data from clinical studies included size of patient population, efficacy endpoints, systemic and topical adverse events, and criteria for confirming a diagnosis of RS. DATA SYNTHESIS: Data showed that INS improved many of the symptoms of RS, including nasal blockage and purulence, facial discomfort, and headache. Significant improvement compared with placebo was demonstrated in most studies in adults and children with acute RS and in adults with recurrent or chronic RS, whether INS were used as monotherapy or adjunctive treatment. INS were shown to be well tolerated in all of these studies.
conclusionINS reduce local inflammation and improve drainage, effects that are critical to the resolution of acute RS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18504478PMC2390689W125970206What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.