ArticleHarm reduction journal2008
Hookah smoking and cancer: carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels in exclusive/ever hookah smokers.
Article in Harm reduction journal, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of age and sex on the diagnostic accuracy of pleural fluid carcinoembryonic antigen for malignant pleural effusion: aFrontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Diagnosis of Relapse of Colorectal Adenocarcinoma through CEA Fluctuation.Reports (MDPI) · 2024Article
- Prognostic value of the ratio of pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen to tumor volume in rectal cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023Article
- Comparison of Urinary Heavy Metals and Pulmonary Function Test in Cafe Workers Based on Exposure to Secondhand Tobacco Smoke, Tehran 2021.International journal of preventive medicine · 2022Article
- Sources of variation and establishment of Russian reference intervals for major hormones and tumor markers.PloS one · 2021Article
- Postoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels cannot predict survival in colorectal cancer patients with type II diabetes.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2020Article
- Waterpipe Smoking among Herat University Students: Prevalence, Attitudes, and Associated Factors.Addiction & health · 2020Article
- Prognostic value of postoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels in colorectal cancer patients who smoke.PloS one · 2020Article
- Air pollutants associated with smoking in indoor/outdoor of waterpipe cafés in Tehran, Iran: Concentrations, affecting factors and health risk assessment.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- The Prevalence, Attitudes, and Correlates of Waterpipe Smoking Among High School Students in Iran: a Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2016Article
- Is Smoking Shisha Safer than Cigarettes: Comparison of Health Effects of Shisha and Cigarette Smoking among Young Adults in Kuwait.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2016Article
- Use & Misuse of Water-filtered Tobacco Smoking Pipes in the World. Consequences for Public Health, Research & Research Ethics.The open medicinal chemistry journal · 2015Article
- Young adult waterpipe smokers: Smoking behaviors and associated subjective and physiological effects.Addictive behaviors · 2014Article
- Risk factors for hookah smoking among arabs and chaldeans.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2014Article
- Harmful effects of shisha: literature review.International archives of medicine · 2014Review
- A novel homogeneous time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay for carcinoembryonic antigen based on water-soluble quantum dots.Journal of fluorescence · 2013Article
- [Rational imaging of metastasized tumor diseases].Der Internist · 2013Review
- False positive result in study on hookah smoking and cancer in Kashmir: measuring risk of poor hygiene is not the same as measuring risk of inhaling water filtered tobacco smoke all over the world.British journal of cancer · 2013Article
- Lessons from the recent case of CO poisoning due to shisha (hookah, narghile) tobacco smoking in Singapore.International journal of emergency medicine · 2010Article
- Hookah, opium and tobacco smoking in relation to oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.British journal of cancer · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe have recently published some work on CEA levels in hookah (also called narghile, shisha elsewhere) and cigarette smokers. Hookah smokers had higher levels of CEA than non-smokers although mean levels were low compared to cigarette smokers. However some of them were also users of other tobacco products (cigarettes, bidis, etc.).
objectivesTo find serum CEA levels in ever/exclusive hookah smokers, i.e. those who smoked only hookah (no cigarettes, bidis, etc.), prepared between 1 and 4 times a day with a quantity of up to 120 g of a tobacco-molasses mixture each (i.e. the tobacco weight equivalent of up to 60 cigarettes of 1 g each) and consumed in 1 to 8 sessions.
methodsEnhanced chemiluminescent immunometric technique was applied to measure CEA levels in serum samples from 59 exclusive male smokers with age ranging from 20-80 years (mean = 58.8 +/- 14.7 years) and 8-65 years of smoking (mean = 37.7 +/- 16.8). 36 non-smokers served as controls. Subjects were divided into 3 groups according to the number of preparations; the number of sessions and the total daily smoking time: Light (1; 1; < or = 20 minutes); Medium (1-3; 1-3; >20 min to < or = 2 hrs) and Heavy smokers (2-4; 3-8; >2 hrs to < or = 6 hrs). Because of the nature of distribution of CEA levels among our individuals, Wilcoxon's rank sum two-sample test was applied to compare the variables.
resultsThe overall CEA levels in exclusive hookah smokers (mean: 3.58 +/- 2.61 ng/ml; n = 59) were not significantly different (p < or = 0.0937) from the levels in non-smokers (2.35 +/- 0.71 ng/ml). Mean levels in light, medium and heavy smokers were: 1.06 +/- 0.492 ng/ml (n = 5); 2.52 +/- 1.15 ng/ml (n = 28) and 5.11 +/- 3.08 ng/ml (n = 26) respectively. The levels in medium smokers and non-smokers were also not significantly different (p < or = 0.9138). In heavy smokers, the CEA levels were significantly higher than in non-smokers (p < or = 0.0001567).
conclusionOverall CEA levels in exclusive hookah smokers were low compared to cigarette smokers. However, heavy hookah smoking substantially raises CEA levels. Low-nitrosamines smokeless tobacco of the SNUS Swedish type could be envisaged as an alternative to smoking for this category of users and also, in a broad harm reduction perspective, to the prevalent low-quality moist snuff called naswar.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.