Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18500580›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2008

An empirical comparison of the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ among patients with COPD.

Wen-Miin Liang, Jian-Jung Chen, Chih-Hung Chang, Hung-Wei Chen, Shiah-Lian Chen, Liang-Wen Hang, Jung-Der Wang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07469111 (Effects Of Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Training Of The Upper Extremity In Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07469111 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effects Of Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Training Of The Upper Extremity In Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorInonu UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled36ConditionsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Blood Flow Restriction Training (BFRT)ArmsLow-Load Blood Flow Restriction Training (LL-BFRT) + Aerobic Exercise, Sham Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Training (LL-BFRT) + Aerobic Exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Daily Activities: The Impact of COPD and Cognitive Dysfunction.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The St George's Respiratory Questionnaire revisited: a psychometric evaluation.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Wen-Miin LiangBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Center, Institute of Biostatistics, Institute of Environmental Health, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Jian-Jung Chen
Chih-Hung Chang
Hung-Wei Chen
Shiah-Lian Chen
Liang-Wen Hang
Jung-Der Wang
China Medical University · TWBuddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital · TWHungkuang University · TWNational Taiwan University · TWNorthwestern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo compare the psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) instrument and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and to examine the association between pulmonary function and domains and items of these questionnaires in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

methodsThe WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ were administered to 211 patients. The reliability and validity of, and correlations among, the domain scores were examined. Multiple regression analyses were performed to identify which items were independently associated with subjects' lung functions.

resultsBoth questionnaires showed good internal consistency (alpha > 0.8), except the SGRQ symptoms domain (alpha = 0.66), minimal ceiling and floor effects, and good item convergent and item discriminant validity. There were moderate correlations between physical domain of the WHOQOL-BREF and activity, impacts and total domains of the SGRQ, and between psychological domain of the WHOQOL-BREF and impacts and total domains of the SGRQ. Eighteen items were significantly associated with lung function, particularly those items relating to mobility/walking and activities of daily living (ADL).

conclusionBoth the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ showed comparable reliability and validity. Items related to mobility/walking and ADL may be useful in clinical screening for lung function impairment.

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesAgedAged, 80 and overEmpirical ResearchHealth StatusHumansMaleMiddle AgedTaiwan

Identifiers

PMID18500580
PMCPMC2440950
OpenAlexW2074030678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.