Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18500565›Full record

ReviewThe AAPS journal2008

Current methods for predicting human food effect.

Kimberley A Lentz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The AAPS journal, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kimberley A LentzPharmaceutical Candidate Optimization: Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, 5 Research Parkway, Wallingford, CT, 06492-7660, USA. kimberley.lentz@bms.com

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food can impact the pharmacokinetics of a drug product through several mechanisms, including but not limited to, enhancement in drug solubility, changes in GI physiology, or direct interaction with the drug. Significant food effects complicate development of new drugs, especially when clinical plans require control and/or monitoring of food intake in relation to dosing. The prediction of whether a drug or drug product will show a human food effect is challenging. In vitro models which consider physical-chemical properties can classify the potential for a compound to demonstrate a positive, negative or no food effect, and may be appropriate for screening compounds at early stages of drug discovery. When comparing various formulations, dissolution tests in biorelevant media can serve as a predictor of human drug performance under fasted and fed conditions. Few in vivo models exist which predict the magnitude of change in pharmacokinetic parameters in humans when dosing in the presence of food, with the dog appearing to be the most studied species for this purpose. Control of gastric pH, as well as the amount and composition of the fed state in dogs are critical parameters to improving the predictability of the dog overall as a food effect model. No single universal model is applicable for all drugs at all stages of drug development. One or more models may be required depending whether the goal is to assess potential for a food effect, determine the magnitude of change in pharmacokinetic parameters in the fed/fasted state, or whether formulation efforts have the ability to mitigate an observed food effect.

Indexed as

Drug DesignFood-Drug InteractionsPharmaceutical PreparationsHumansPharmacokineticsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID18500565
PMCPMC2751375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.