Trial reportEuropean radiology2008
MRI of the small bowel: can sufficient bowel distension be achieved with small volumes of oral contrast?
Trial report in European radiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A prospective randomized controlled study of erythromycin on gastric and small intestinal distention: implications for MR enterography.European journal of radiology · 2014Trial
- Small bowel MRI enteroclysis or follow through: which is optimal?World journal of gastroenterology · 2009Trial
- Intestinal distension in patients with Crohn's disease studied by CT and MRI: techniques and review of the literature.BJR open · 2026Review
- Challenges and Strategies to Optimising the Quality of Small Bowel Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Crohn's Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- The Role of Magnetic Resonance Enterography in Crohn's Disease: A Review of Recent Literature.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- The first joint ESGAR/ ESPR consensus statement on the technical performance of cross-sectional small bowel and colonic imaging.European radiology · 2017Article
- How we do it: MR enterography.Pediatric radiology · 2016Review
- Indications and selection of MR enterography vs. MR enteroclysis with emphasis on patients who need small bowel MRI and general anaesthesia: results of a survey.Insights into imaging · 2015Article
- Comparison of 3% sorbitol vs psyllium fibre as oral contrast agents in MR enterography.The British journal of radiology · 2014Article
- Gastrointestinal imaging-practical magnetic resonance imaging approach.World journal of radiology · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sufficient luminal distension is mandatory for small bowel imaging. However, patients often are unable to ingest volumes of currently applied oral contrast compounds. The aim of this study was to evaluate if administration of low doses of an oral contrast agent with high-osmolarity leads to sufficient and diagnostic bowel distension. Six healthy volunteers ingested at different occasions 150, 300 and 450 ml of a commercially available oral contrast agent (Banana Smoothie Readi-Cat, E-Z-EM; 194 mOsmol/l). Two-dimensional TrueFISP data sets were acquired in 5-min intervals up to 45 min after contrast ingestion. Small bowel distension was quantified using a visual five-grade ranking (5 = very good distension, 1 = collapsed bowel). Results were statistically compared using a Wilcoxon-Rank test. Ingestion of 450 ml and 300 ml resulted in a significantly better distension than 150 ml. The all-over average distension value for 450 ml amounted to 3.4 (300 ml: 3.0, 150 ml: 2.3) and diagnostic bowel distension could be found throughout the small intestine. Even 45 min after ingestion of 450 ml the jejunum and ileum could be reliably analyzed. Small bowel imaging with low doses of contrast leads to diagnostic distension values in healthy subjects when a high-osmolarity substance is applied. These findings may help to further refine small bowel MRI techniques, but need to be confirmed in patients with small bowel disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18500525What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.