Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18500383›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of pharmacology2008

Gene doping: the hype and the reality.

D J Wells

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of pharmacology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Angiogenic Doping: Plausible Yet Difficult to Detect.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Has Athletic Performance Reached its Peak?Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2015
    Review
  9. Review
  10. In sport and social justice, is genetic enhancement a game changer?Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2012
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Gene doping: Olympic genes for Olympic dreams.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2011
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Genetic enhancement in sports: The role of reason and private rationalities in the public arena.Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees · 2011
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Genetic doping and health damages.Iranian journal of public health · 2011
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Genetic engineering in athletes.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

D J WellsDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Imperial College London, London, UK. d.wells@imperial.ac.uk
Imperial College London · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some spectacular results from genetic manipulation of laboratory rodents and increasing developments in human gene therapy raise the spectre of genetic modification or 'gene doping' in sports. Candidate targets include the induction of muscle hypertrophy through overexpression of specific splice variants of insulin-like growth factor-1 or blockade of the action of myostatin, increasing oxygen delivery by raising the hematocrit through the use of erythropoietin, induction of angiogenesis with vascular endothelial growth factors or related molecules and changes in muscle phenotype through expression of peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor- delta and associated molecules. Some of these potential genetic enhancements, particularly where the genetic modification and its action are confined to the muscles, may be undetectable using current tests. This had lead to exaggerated predictions that gene doping in athletics will be common within the next few years. However, a review of the methods of gene transfer and the current 'state of the art' in development of genetic treatments for human disease show that the prospects for gene doping remain essentially theoretical at present. Despite this conclusion, it will be important to continue to monitor improvements in the technology and to develop methods of detection, particularly those based on identifying patterns of changes in response to doping as opposed to the detection of specific agents.

Indexed as

Doping in SportsGenetic EnhancementGene Transfer TechniquesAnimalsGenetic TherapyHumansSubstance Abuse Detection

Identifiers

PMID18500383
PMCPMC2439520
OpenAlexW2005008151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.