Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18500269›Full record

Trial reportModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2008

Automated detection of genetic abnormalities combined with cytology in sputum is a sensitive predictor of lung cancer.

Ruth L Katz, Tanweer M Zaidi, Ricardo L Fernandez, Jingpin Zhang, Weigong He, Charisse Acosta, Michal Daniely, Lea Madi, Mary A Vargas, Qiong Dong and 7 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Microbiota Biomarkers for Lung Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  9. Sputum long non-coding RNA biomarkers for diagnosis of lung cancer.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Clinical Utility of Chromosomal Aneusomy in Individuals at High Risk of Lung Cancer.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Sputum microRNA biomarkers for identifying lung cancer in indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodules.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Analysis of MicroRNAs in sputum to improve computed tomography for lung cancer diagnosis.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2014
    Article
  18. Review
  19. The state of molecular biomarkers for the early detection of lung cancer.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2012
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Jiang, Xiaoying Gao Feng [corrected to Gao, Xiaoying]; Jiang, Feng [added]
  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ruth L KatzDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030-4009, USA. rkatz@mdanderson.org
Tanweer M Zaidi
Ricardo L Fernandez
Jingpin Zhang
Weigong He
Charisse Acosta
Michal Daniely
Lea Madi
Mary A Vargas
Qiong Dong
Xiaoying Gao
Xiaoying Gao Feng Jiang
Feng Jiang
Nancy P Caraway
Ara A Vaporciyan
Jack A Roth
Margaret R Spitz
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS--SPORE IN LUNG CANCERP50CA070907 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI BYERS, LAUREN AVERETT · 1996 to 2024
$57.4M
PHASE II PROSTATE CLINICAL TRIAL OF MODULATION OF INTERMN01CN085083 · CN · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KUCUK, OMER · 1999 to 1999
–
NCI NIH HHS N0 1 CN 85083 57NCI NIH HHS P50 CA070907NCI NIH HHS P50CA70907
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection of lung cancer by sputum cytology has low sensitivity but is noninvasive and, if improved, could be a powerful tool for early lung cancer detection. To evaluate whether the accuracy of diagnosing lung cancer by evaluating sputa for cytologic atypia and genetic abnormalities is greater than that of conventional cytology alone, automated scoring of genetic abnormalities for 3p22.1 and 10q22.3 (SP-A) by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and conventional cytology was done on sputa from 35 subjects with lung cancer, 25 high-risk smokers, and 6 healthy control subjects. Multivariate analysis was performed to select variables that most accurately predicted lung cancer. A model of probability for the presence of lung cancer was derived for each subject. Cells exfoliated from patients with lung cancer contained genetic aberrations and cytologic atypias at significantly higher levels than in those from control subjects. When combined with cytologic atypia, a model of risk for lung cancer was derived that had 74% sensitivity and 82% specificity to predict the presence of lung cancer, whereas conventional cytology achieved only 37% sensitivity and 87% specificity. For diagnosing lung cancer in sputum, a combination of molecular and cytologic variables was superior to using conventional cytology alone.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsChromosomes, Human, Pair 11Chromosomes, Human, Pair 3AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, NeuroendocrineCarcinoma, Squamous CellCytodiagnosisFemaleHumansImage CytometryIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID18500269
PMCPMC3377448
OpenAlexW2023428878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.