Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18500246›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2008

Telomere dysfunction and tumour suppression: the senescence connection.

Yibin Deng, Suzanne S Chan, Sandy Chang

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 184 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
184citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
23.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

184 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 400 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. NADCommunications biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

124 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yibin DengDepartment of Cancer Genetics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Suzanne S Chan
Sandy Chang
Cancer Genetics (United States) · US

Funding

Telomere induced senescence as a supressor of tumorigenesisR01CA129037 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CHANG, SANDY S · 2007 to 2017
$3.1M
The role of the telomere capping protein POT1 in mammalian agingR01AG028888 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI CHANG, SANDY S · 2007 to 2009
$934k
Telomere dysfunction, p53 and tumorigenesisK01CA124461 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DENG, YIBIN · 2007 to 2011
$765k
NCI NIH HHS 1K01CA124461NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129037NIA NIH HHS R01 AG028888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-lived organisms such as humans have evolved several intrinsic tumour suppressor mechanisms to combat the slew of oncogenic somatic mutations that constantly arise in proliferating stem-cell compartments. One of these anticancer barriers is the telomere, a specialized nucleoprotein complex that caps the ends of eukaryotic chromosome. Impaired telomere function activates the canonical DNA damage response pathway that engages p53 to initiate apoptosis or replicative senescence. Here, we discuss how p53-dependent senescence induced by dysfunctional telomeres may be as potent as apoptosis in suppressing tumorigenesis in vivo.

Indexed as

Cellular SenescenceTelomereAnimalsApoptosisCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21DNA DamageHumansNeoplasmsRetinoblastoma ProteinTelomeraseTumor Suppressor Protein p53CDKN1A protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21Retinoblastoma ProteinTelomeraseTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID18500246
PMCPMC3688269
OpenAlexW2036639619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.