Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18499528›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2008

Reasons for declining computerized insulin protocol recommendations: application of a framework.

K Sward, J Orme, D Sorenson, L Baumann, A H Morris, Reengineering Critical Care Clinical Research Investigators

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Integrative review of clinical decision support for registered nurses in acute care settings.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

K SwardCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, 10 South 2000 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA. kathy.sward@nurs.utah.edu
J Orme
D Sorenson
L Baumann
A H Morris
Reengineering Critical Care Clinical Research Investigators

Funding

Re-Engineering the Clinical Research EnterpriseN01HC045210 · HC · LDS HOSPITAL · PI MORRIS, ALAN H · 2004 to 2004
–
NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC045210PHS HHS HHSN268200425210C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical decision support systems (CDS) can interpret detailed treatment protocols for ICU care providers. In open-loop systems, clinicians can decline protocol recommendations. We capture their reasons for declining as part of ongoing, iterative protocol validation and refinement processes. Even though our protocol was well-accepted by clinicians overall, noncompliance patterns revealed potential protocol improvement targets, and suggested ways to reduce barriers impeding software use. We applied Rita Kukafka and colleagues' (2003) IT implementation framework to identify and categorize reasons documented by ICU nurses when declining recommendations from an insulin-titration protocol. Two methods were used to operationalize the framework: reasons for declining recommendations from actual software use, and a nurse questionnaire. Applying the framework exposed limitations of our data sources, and suggested ways to address those limitations; and facilitated our analyses and interpretations.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPoint-of-Care SystemsCritical CareDecision Support Systems, ManagementDrug Therapy, Computer-AssistedGuideline AdherenceInsulinProfessional CompetenceUtahInsulin

Identifiers

PMID18499528
PMCPMC2490709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.