ArticleThe Journal of urology2008
A pilot trial of vascular targeted photodynamic therapy for renal tissue.
Article in The Journal of urology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Safety and Efficacy of Vascular-Targeted Photodynamic Therapy in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.Cancers · 2025Article
- Therapeutic applications of carbon nanomaterials in renal cancer.Biotechnology letters · 2023Review
- Preclinical Studies on the Safety and Toxicity of Photoditazine in the Antibacterial Photodynamic Therapy of Uropathogenic Bacteria.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Treatment Effects of WST11 Vascular Targeted Photodynamic Therapy for Urothelial Cell Carcinoma in Swine.The Journal of urology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeVascular targeted photodynamic therapy represents the newest generation of photodynamic therapy and a new paradigm for minimally invasive ablative therapy. We report a pilot trial of vascular targeted photodynamic therapy to evaluate the effect on porcine renal tissue. MATERIALS AND
methodsPigs underwent continuous infusion of WST-09 (Negma-Lerads, Toussous le Noble, France) and concurrent illumination with interstitial laser at a wavelength of 763 nm to the lower pole of the kidney. Drug doses were 0.5 to 1.0 mg/kg and light doses were 100 to 200 J. Nuclear renography was performed on postoperative day 5. On postoperative day 7 arteriography, pyelography, computerized tomography of the abdomen and necropsy were performed.
resultsFour of 7 animals completed therapy and all evaluations. Three animals died, including 1 of surgical complications and 2 of an anaphylactoid reaction to the Cremophor solvent in the compound. All kidneys in surviving animals functioned on nuclear renography. Renal function remained unchanged. No lesions or urine leakage was visible on imaging. On necropsy lesion size was 5 x 4 x 3 to 7 x 7 x 14 mm depending on the drug/light dose. Histology showed a distinct demarcation between the treated zone and the surrounding parenchyma at higher doses. Lesions were well demarcated with necrotic tubules, glomerular fibrinoid necrosis, capillary loop thrombosis, interstitial hemorrhage and lymphocytic infiltrates.
conclusionsSignificant tissue effect with some necrosis was seen at these low drug/light combinations. This study provides the initial proof of principle that justifies further preclinical investigation of vascular targeted photodynamic therapy for renal tumors. A newer, water based formulation should decrease the incidence of reactions in swine. This newer formulation may allow further safe investigation of this novel treatment paradigm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.